I have now created the argouml-db project (under seeds) and granted you
(jgunderson) the developer role so that you can start working with the
project.
/Linus
2007/9/25, Gunderson, Jeff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
> Hi Linus,
>
>
>
> How about if we use argouml-db? If you want take a look at the module
> here's the SourceForge site:
>
>
>
> https://sourceforge.net/projects/dbuml/
>
>
>
> We'll probably have some work to do to fit the standard requirements of
> ArgoUML components. We'll start looking at those.
>
>
>
> Jeff
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> *From:* [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] *On Behalf Of *Linus
> Tolke
> *Sent:* Tuesday, September 25, 2007 1:38 AM
> *To:* [email protected]
> *Subject:* Re: [argouml-dev] argouml-sql
>
>
>
> One week is enough to wait for this kind of questions. Let me know what
> name do you want for the project and I will create it. I prefer the name to
> be something like "argouml-<whatever>" to look like other ArgoUML projects.
>
>
>
> /Linus
>
>
>
> 2007/9/24, Gunderson, Jeff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
> Hi Linus,
>
>
>
> Should we wait longer for input on others on having a GPL sub-project? It
> would be good if we could be part of the ArgoUML community.
>
>
>
> Jeff
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> *From:* [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] *On Behalf Of *Linus
> Tolke
> *Sent:* Wednesday, September 19, 2007 2:12 AM
> *To:* [email protected]
> *Subject:* Re: [argouml-dev] argouml-sql
>
>
>
> Hello Jeff!
>
>
>
> The license questions are always complicated.
>
>
>
> The purpose of requiring the BSD license is to allow for companies to take
> ArgoUML, make additions and market the resulting product. We could accept
> that this is not possible for the SQL plug-in or for a specific SQL plug-in
> and still allow the other parts of the infrastructure (since GPL is accepted
> by Tigris).
>
>
>
> Perhaps it is then best to keep the two separate implementations. One with
> the BSD license, that we hope all database engine manufacturers will pick
> up, improve for their RDBMS and market together with their RDBMS-product.
> One GPL version that we hope all database engine manufacturers will suggest
> improvements for as they see their users using it. Which of these scenarios
> that is the most likely to be successful is hard to say. It probably depends
> more on the developers involved than on the choice of policy.
>
>
>
> Let me just ask all developers:
>
> Is there any reason, not to take in a GPLed subproject in the ArgoUML
> project?
>
>
>
> /Linus
>
>
>
> 2007/9/18, Gunderson, Jeff <[EMAIL PROTECTED] >:
>
> I was hoping this could be a sub-project of ArgoUML so that we could use
> the infrastructure of the ArgoUML but it looks like all sub-projects must be
> under the BSD license. Can you please verify?
>
>
>
> We must use the GPL license.
>
>
>
> Jeff
>
>
>
