OK. I will fix it.
Having had a look at this, I agree that there are too many open issues
still. I will plan 0.25.7 for Saturday. I hope that is enough time.
/Linus
2008/6/18, Bob Tarling <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
> I'm not so familiar with your release procedures and scripts.
>
> I do think the next release should be delayed until this is sorted though.
>
> Bob.
>
>
> 2008/6/18 Linus Tolke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> > It would be nice but I haven't fixed it yet. Can you fix it and I will be
> > back later tonight (in three hours or so) and do the work then?
> >
> > /Linus
> >
> >
> > 2008/6/18, Bob Tarling <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> >>
> >> Hi Linus
> >>
> >> Will you have issue 5159 resolved in that same release?
> >>
> >> Regards
> >>
> >> Bob
> >>
> >>
> >> 2008/6/18 Linus Tolke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> >> > Great! I will proceed with the 0.25.7 release tonight or tomorrow
> night
> >> > then.
> >> >
> >> > Another thing... could I bother you to change the name of the
> >> > anarres-cpp-file or change back to how it was before? I would like to
> >> > have
> >> > the version numbers last since my skript that calculates the name for
> >> > java
> >> > web start removes and adds the version numbers only if they are last
> in
> >> > the
> >> > name (before the suffix).
> >> >
> >> > /Linus
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > 2008/6/16, Luis Sergio Oliveira <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> >> >>
> >> >> Hello Linus,
> >> >>
> >> >> Linus Tolke wrote:
> >> >>>
> >> >>> This, more or less, renders the 0.25.6 release useless. Could we
> make
> >> >>> a
> >> >>> 0.25.7 release as soon as this is solved? Who is working on this?
> >> >>> /Linus
> >> >>
> >> >> I've attached a modified anarres-cpp-1.2.3.jar to issue-argouml-cpp
> #27
> >> >> (http://argouml-cpp.tigris.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=27). If this
> is
> >> >> copied
> >> >> over the existing file with the same name in the ext/ directory it
> >> >> will
> >> >> remove the problem, and therefore it enables verifications in 0.25.6
> to
> >> >> occur. I know, its a work-around!
> >> >>
> >> >> For 0.25.7 - if you move forward with that one - I already committed
> a
> >> >> better fix to the argouml-cpp module in revision 228.
> >> >>
> >> >> Tom already committed a fix to issue #5089 in revision 14958 - he
> >> >> didn't
> >> >> marked that issue as FIXED, though.
> >> >>
> >> >> So, I think that this is prepared for an additional release. Do you
> >> >> agree
> >> >> Tom?
> >> >>
> >> >> Regards and apologies for the lost work,
> >> >>
> >> >> Luis
> >> >>
> >> >>
> >> >> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> >> >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >> >> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >> >>
> >> >
> >> >
> >>
> >> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >>
> >
> >
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>
