All my efforts since 0.26 has been on issues that people have targeted for 0.26.1.
So for myself I am about 6 weeks behind schedule. Regards Bob. 2008/11/8 Linus Tolke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > When will you be ready for entering the alpha period for 0.28? Bob and Luis, > what does "amended" mean in this case? The first alpha release was set a > long time ago to Wednesday. Is that too early? Should we make a 0.27.2 > release instead? > > /Linus > > 2008/11/5 Jan M. Andersen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >> >> I have just started work on merging the GSOC work in the C-Sharp module so >> I'm definitely behind. >> >> I'll be on vacation from nov. 11th. And I'm not sure if I will be able to >> complete it before then. >> >> Vennlig hilsen >> Jan M. Andersen >> Tlf. 90 20 76 17 >> Primrose >> >> -----Original Message----- >> From: Bob Tarling [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] >> Sent: 4. november 2008 23:01 >> To: [email protected] >> Subject: [argouml-dev] 0.28 GSOC merge (was 0.26.1 status) >> >> Personally I think we are ready for 0.26.1 (once the last branch patch >> is applied for issue 5420). >> >> Both myself and Christian have diverted all attention that might have >> gone into the sequence diagrams in order to sort out this branch. So >> our work towards 0.28 is behind. >> >> I'll get back to sequence diagrams next. >> >> Where are others regarding the merge of GSOC work? Should we be >> amending our 0.28 timelines? >> >> Bob. >> >> >> 2008/11/3 Thomas N. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: >> > Hi Bob, >> > >> > the actual status for 0.26.1 looks promising, I hope the release comes >> soon! >> > >> > Our team was a little "slow" regarding 0.26.1 (I don't exclude myself), >> > I >> wonder how our progress will be with "just" integrating the GSoC work for >> the next stable release (I'm not sure about my own contributions in the >> next >> times). >> > >> > Regards, >> > Thomas >> > >> > -------- Original-Nachricht -------- >> >> Datum: Sun, 2 Nov 2008 10:45:24 +0000 >> >> Von: "Bob Tarling" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >> >> An: [email protected] >> >> Betreff: Re: [argouml-dev] 0.26.1 status >> > >> >> It looks like we are closer to getting all 0.26.1 issues resolved. >> >> >> >> I repeat my request for a release plan. >> >> >> >> Bob. >> >> >> >> >> >> 2008/10/30 Bob Tarling <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: >> >> > What are the feelings about now going ahead with 0.26.1 (marking >> >> > issue >> >> > 5438 as fixed and untargeting issue 5420) >> >> > >> >> > I would rather have 5420 fixed if possible but I think it's more >> >> > important to have a release out asap with the other fixes. >> >> > >> >> > What's the procedure for a defect release. Do we do one beta and then >> >> > release? What are the timescales? >> >> > >> >> > Regards >> >> > >> >> > Bob. >> >> > >> >> > >> >> > 2008/10/27 Christian López Espínola <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: >> >> >> Hi Bob, >> >> >> >> >> >> On Mon, Oct 27, 2008 at 8:38 PM, Bob Tarling <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >> >> wrote: >> >> >>>> Should it actually be a showstopper? It seems to me that this is >> most >> >> >>>> likely a long term bug that doesn't appear to have caused any >> >> >>>> problems other than that which Tom has already fixed. >> >> >>> >> >> >>> Are there any views on the above statement? >> >> >> >> >> >> I need to test those patches on the branch. >> >> >> First step would be getting them and attaching to the issue, >> >> >> applying >> >> >> to the branch and test. >> >> >> But I'm really busy this week, so I don't know how many testing I >> >> >> will >> >> >> be able of doing on them. >> >> >> Help is welcome. >> >> >> >> >> >>> If there are no known manifestation of defect 5438 then I'd prefer >> >> >>> i (ssue 5476 and 5477 were done instead but with more time and >> testing >> >> >>> than would be available for 0.26.1. >> >> >> >> >> >> I've read those and they seem great for the next release. IMHO they >> >> >> make things simpler. >> >> >> >> >> >>> Bob. >> >> >>> >> >> >>> >> >> >>> 2008/10/26 Bob Tarling <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: >> >> >>>> I'm back from holiday now. >> >> >>>> >> >> >>>> Is there any change in the opinion on this? Is issue 5438 still >> >> >>>> considered the only showstopper for 0.26.1? >> >> >>>> >> >> >>>> Should it actually be a showstopper? It seems to me that this is >> most >> >> >>>> likely a long term bug that doesn't appear to have caused any >> >> >>>> problems other than that which Tom has already fixed. >> >> >>>> >> >> >>>> Bob. >> >> >>>> >> >> >>>> 2008/10/15 Thomas N. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: >> >> >>>>> Hi! >> >> >>>>> >> >> >>>>>> > I'm concerned about the fixes for issue 5438, exceptions on >> >> delete, >> >> >>>>>> > since they seem to be more extensive than the limited testing >> >> we'll be >> >> >>>>>> > doing would make appropriate, although Christian seems in >> >> >>>>>> > favor >> >> of >> >> >>>>>> > including them in the release. Someone needs to finish the >> >> >>>>>> > work >> >> >>>>>> > though. >> >> >>>>>> >> >> >>>>>> So this is our only "must have" for 0.26.1? >> >> >>>>>> >> >> >>>>>> Is anybody able to tackle this? >> >> >>>>> >> >> >>>>> It is the only 0.26.1 stopper in my opinion. Yesterday I tried >> >> >>>>> one >> >> hour to figure how to fix it, but no success: it's not very clear to me >> what >> >> needs to be done in the Fig classes, and how to test if it is done >> >> properly. Anybody else? >> >> >>>>> >> >> >>>>> Thomas >> >> >>>>> -- >> >> >>>>> GMX startet ShortView.de. Hier findest Du Leute mit Deinen >> >> Interessen! >> >> >>>>> Jetzt dabei sein: >> >> http://www.shortview.de/[EMAIL PROTECTED] >> >> >>>>> >> >> >>>>> >> >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >> >> >>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> >> >>>>> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> >> >>>>> >> >> >>>>> >> >> >>>> >> >> >>> >> >> >>> >> >> >>> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >> >> >>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> >> >>> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> >> >>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> -- >> >> >> Cheers, >> >> >> >> >> >> Christian López Espínola <penyaskito> >> >> >> >> >> > >> >> >> >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >> >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> >> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> > >> > -- >> > GMX Download-Spiele: Preizsturz! Alle Puzzle-Spiele Deluxe über 60% >> billiger. >> > >> >> http://games.entertainment.gmx.net/de/entertainment/games/download/puzzle/in >> dex.html >> > >> > --------------------------------------------------------------------- >> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> > >> > >> >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> >> >> No virus found in this incoming message. >> Checked by AVG - http://www.avg.com >> Version: 8.0.175 / Virus Database: 270.8.6/1766 - Release Date: 11/4/2008 >> 8:26 AM >> >> >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
