On Wed, Dec 31, 2008 at 11:57 AM, Bob Tarling <[email protected]> wrote:
> We have two choices, to keep to PGML standard or not > > We could abandon strict adherence to PGML and just add whatever tags > and attributes we wish. That would certainly make our job easier. PGML isn't a standard. It was a proposal submitted to be used as the basis for what eventually became SVG. PGML wasn't selected and as far as I know there are no other tools that use it. In June 2000, Jason Robbins said that he had hired someone to replace PGML with SVG in GEF. http://markmail.org/message/4lwlrdfgm3fvj6ff Anyone know what happened to the code? >> 1) The PGML.tee file in argouml contains a number of <private> tags. > > See section C.5 in http://www.w3.org/TR/1998/NOTE-PGML-19980410 > Private tags are the extension point of PGML if there is no tag or > attribute available in the PGML spec for what you require then in > theory it should be specified as > <private> > <argouml:percent></argouml:percent> > <argouml:angle></argouml:angle> > <argouml:offset></argouml:offset> > </private> One thing to be careful of is existing uses of the <private> tag which, I think, use CRLF delimited data in some cases instead of using XML tagging. The two won't mix well together. >> 4) Are are there any other useful references for PGML other than the >> following? If so, please let me know! > > Not that I'm aware of. There's the PGML.dtd in the same directory as PGML.tee. It should also be updated with whatever changes you decide to make. Tom ------------------------------------------------------ http://argouml.tigris.org/ds/viewMessage.do?dsForumId=450&dsMessageId=998874 To unsubscribe from this discussion, e-mail: [[email protected]].
