Hi Michiel, On Sun, Jan 4, 2009 at 7:58 AM, Michiel van der Wulp <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi All, > > Let me clarify my thoughts about the Message Notation, i.e. currently 2 > classes: MessageNotationUml and SDMessageNotationUml. > > I split them myself, for issue 5150 - one for the collaboration diagram, > one for the sequence diagram. > But now I am not even sure yet we need 2 different classes. > IIUC from the standard, then the Message notation for both diagrams > should have the same capabilities. > > We may choose to show one or more optional part less or more in one > diagram as opposed to the other, though. > > Maybe (1) we don't introduce a difference at all, or (2) make things > selectable by the user with different defaults per diagram. > > And the "things" are at least: showing sequence numbers. > > If we make them selectable per diagram, then that would be the first > time we have a setting with diagram scope - not a step lightly to take IMHO. > > PS: Christian offered to work on uniting the 2 classes with an abstract > superclass containing the common code - maybe the best way to guarantee > that we can merge them later.
This has been done in revision 16499. > I'll try to look at the Message notation parsing (issue 5150). > > Regards, > Michiel > > ------------------------------------------------------ > http://argouml.tigris.org/ds/viewMessage.do?dsForumId=450&dsMessageId=1002253 > > To unsubscribe from this discussion, e-mail: > [[email protected]]. > -- Cheers, Christian López Espínola <penyaskito> ------------------------------------------------------ http://argouml.tigris.org/ds/viewMessage.do?dsForumId=450&dsMessageId=1002867 To unsubscribe from this discussion, e-mail: [[email protected]].
