There was at least one more issue that I have just changed the target for.

Bob

On 29 June 2010 21:36, Linus Tolke Tigris <[email protected]> wrote:
> I have now merged the solution to issues 6086 and 6090. I have not had time
> to work to find a solution to issue 6093. Does issue 6093 need to be
> resolved for 0.30.2? When can we find a solution?
>         /Linus
>
> On Tue, Jun 29, 2010 at 5:09 PM, Linus Tolke Tigris <[email protected]>
> wrote:
>>
>> I will have a look at and perhaps attempt to merge the solutions to the
>> three issues that have been mentioned, tonight.
>>         /Linus
>>
>> On Tue, Jun 29, 2010 at 11:56 AM, Linus Tolke Tigris <[email protected]>
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> I agree!
>>>
>>> Just this morning I added a suggestion to the wiki. I didn't come around
>>> to finish it and inform you.
>>>
>>> My suggestion is based on that everything is more or less ready for the
>>> 0.30.2 release. Is that the case? Do we need beta-releases?
>>>
>>>         /Linus
>>>
>>> On Tue, Jun 29, 2010 at 10:20 AM, Thomas Neustupny <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Hi Linus,
>>>>
>>>> I agree with Bob that the 0.30.2 plan is needed. There are some
>>>> important fixes that should go into the maintainance release.
>>>>
>>>> Thomas
>>>>
>>>> -------- Original-Nachricht --------
>>>> > Datum: Mon, 28 Jun 2010 18:34:04 +0100
>>>> > Von: Bob Tarling <[email protected]>
>>>> > An: [email protected]
>>>> > Betreff: Re: [argouml-dev] 0.30.2? and beyond?
>>>>
>>>> > Depending on the feedback after issue 6099 (rev 18455) is in a dev
>>>> > release I'd be tempted to include that in 0.30.2 also.
>>>> >
>>>> > What are the plans for the 0.30.2 release Linus?
>>>> >
>>>> > Regards
>>>> >
>>>> > Bob
>>>> >
>>>> > On 27 May 2010 20:44, Bob Tarling <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>> > > The applicable revisions are noted on those defects. I don't think
>>>> > > there is anything complex there.
>>>> > >
>>>> > > These are directly links to the svn mailing list in markmail for the
>>>> > changes
>>>> > >
>>>> > > http://markmail.org/message/u6rdzkkwfq2tlg6f
>>>> > > http://markmail.org/message/iwnnsj2i63x2ugsq
>>>> > > http://markmail.org/message/eu5eehlzwrsqc2e3
>>>> > > http://markmail.org/message/lb2wwtkoa3zdffvd
>>>> > >
>>>> > > Bob
>>>> > >
>>>> > >
>>>> > > On 27 May 2010 19:54, Linus Tolke Tigris <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>> > >> It is not only the seriousness of the problem that we should
>>>> > >> consider
>>>> > but
>>>> > >> also the level of confidence that we can make a fix without
>>>> > >> breaking
>>>> > >> anything. These are stable releases...
>>>> > >> I think the two serious problems you describe below are serious
>>>> > >> enough
>>>> > to
>>>> > >> consider a 0.30.2 release if the fix is low-risk.
>>>> > >>         /Linus
>>>> > >>
>>>> > >> On Wed, May 26, 2010 at 2:21 PM, Bob Tarling
>>>> > >> <[email protected]>
>>>> > wrote:
>>>> > >>>
>>>> > >>> Linus, what is your view of continuing with defect releases while
>>>> > >>> development continues in trunk.
>>>> > >>>
>>>> > >>> How extreme does a newly discovered defect have to be to consider
>>>> > >>> a
>>>> > 0.30.2
>>>> > >>>
>>>> > >>> The two I've seen fixed recently that could have a major impact on
>>>> > users
>>>> > >>> are
>>>> > >>>
>>>> > >>> http://argouml.tigris.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=6090 This makes
>>>> > >>> swimlanes in diagrams unusable. Existing users diagrams with
>>>> > >>> swimlanes
>>>> > >>> can't have new transitions added. (we have had two reports of this
>>>> > >>> in
>>>> > >>> a short time)
>>>> > >>>
>>>> > >>> http://argouml.tigris.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=6086 This means
>>>> > >>> activity diagrams can't be used for AndroMDA users in the way
>>>> > >>> described in their tutorial (part of which I thing we wrote).
>>>> > >>>
>>>> > >>> I don't want to start requesting a new release for every defect
>>>> > >>> fixed
>>>> > >>> but we need to work out how and why we decide a defect fix should
>>>> > >>> trigger a defect fix in branch.
>>>> > >>>
>>>> > >>> We could suggest users go to the next dev release but that will
>>>> > >>> include other changes we may not want them to have.
>>>> > >>>
>>>> > >>> Regards
>>>> > >>>
>>>> > >>> Bob
>>>> > >>>
>>>> > >>> ------------------------------------------------------
>>>> > >>>
>>>> > >>>
>>>> >
>>>> > http://argouml.tigris.org/ds/viewMessage.do?dsForumId=450&dsMessageId=2613623
>>>> > >>>
>>>> > >>> To unsubscribe from this discussion, e-mail:
>>>> > >>> [[email protected]].
>>>> > >>> To be allowed to post to the list contact the mailing list
>>>> > >>> moderator,
>>>> > >>> email: [[email protected]]
>>>> > >>
>>>> > >>
>>>> > >
>>>> >
>>>> > ------------------------------------------------------
>>>> >
>>>> > http://argouml.tigris.org/ds/viewMessage.do?dsForumId=450&dsMessageId=2627015
>>>> >
>>>> > To unsubscribe from this discussion, e-mail:
>>>> > [[email protected]].
>>>> > To be allowed to post to the list contact the mailing list moderator,
>>>> > email: [[email protected]]
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> GRATIS für alle GMX-Mitglieder: Die maxdome Movie-FLAT!
>>>> Jetzt freischalten unter http://portal.gmx.net/de/go/maxdome01
>>>>
>>>> ------------------------------------------------------
>>>>
>>>> http://argouml.tigris.org/ds/viewMessage.do?dsForumId=450&dsMessageId=2627246
>>>>
>>>> To unsubscribe from this discussion, e-mail:
>>>> [[email protected]].
>>>> To be allowed to post to the list contact the mailing list moderator,
>>>> email: [[email protected]]
>>>
>>
>
>

------------------------------------------------------
http://argouml.tigris.org/ds/viewMessage.do?dsForumId=450&dsMessageId=2632690

To unsubscribe from this discussion, e-mail: 
[[email protected]].
To be allowed to post to the list contact the mailing list moderator, email: 
[[email protected]]

Reply via email to