On Tue, Dec 21, 2010 at 6:19 PM, Christian López Espínola < [email protected]> wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 16, 2010 at 11:43 AM, Peter Kortvelyesi < > [email protected]> wrote: > >> Dear Developers, >> >> We have received 3 survey entries, thank you for taking your time filling >> it out. >> I've replied to Bob's previous suggestions, unfortunetly not on the list, >> and corrected the ambiguous parts of the survey. >> >> We are preparing an article that is to be submitted to an international >> conference and ArgoUML's quality results and the survey result will be part >> of there is still no problem with that. >> >> As the deadline of the submission is approaching I would like to ask all >> of you who has not yet submitted the votes for the quality survey to >> participate and fill the survey out by the 20th of December. >> >> Thanks you for your participation, >> wishing you a very pleasant Christmas and a happy new year, >> Peter >> > > Just filled it, hope that I'm not too late. > I also just completed it. I missed the fact that it had a deadline associated with it. I'm not sure who much information I really provided though since one normally needs to get a group of people to a) agree on term definitions and b) get calibrated to each other or to some standard for the evaluations to mean anything. I also went back and deleted all my stability scores since my original understanding of the textual description was almost exactly what was asked in the later maintainability question. It's also strange that v18.1 or whatever the first MDR release was is left out since that's one of the most significant from an architectural change point of view (unless I'm mis-remembering my versions). Good luck with the paper. It'll be interesting to see how the tools' outputs compare with developers' subjective views. If you're designing something like this in the future, you might consider asking developers who various subsystems/modules compare with each other, in their view, and then comparing the relative measures with relative quantitative measures. That might help with your baseline calibration issue. Tom ------------------------------------------------------ http://argouml.tigris.org/ds/viewMessage.do?dsForumId=450&dsMessageId=2692633 To unsubscribe from this discussion, e-mail: [[email protected]]. To be allowed to post to the list contact the mailing list moderator, email: [[email protected]]
