Hi,
> Is it considered acceptable for our first UML2 release to NOT contain
> those last 4 diagram types and add support for those in later
> releases?

I think it's a good step. 

I don't know if "acceptable", but I agree with Thomas: "as long as the list of 
currently supported diagrams is documented"

------------------------------------------------------
http://argouml.tigris.org/ds/viewMessage.do?dsForumId=450&dsMessageId=2740791

To unsubscribe from this discussion, e-mail: 
[[email protected]].
To be allowed to post to the list contact the mailing list moderator, email: 
[[email protected]]

Reply via email to