Hello again Mark!

My knowledge of maven is limited so I can only guess as to what would be the
best way forward. Please proceed with this if you think this is the natural
way to do it. The items 2 - 5 should go in the toppom.xml since they involve
several projects.

The argouml maven2 respository is an SVN based repository. For snapshot jars
I would like to publish them from a repository that is not SVN-based (to
reduce long term disk space usage). Shall I set up a public maven repository
for publishing the snapshot versions on the build host? Could we do that
someplace with more available bandwidth and better up-time?

        /Linus



2011/8/9 Mark Fortner <[email protected]>

> Hi Linus,
> It sounds like you've made a lot of progress towards getting the Maven
> build working. Perhaps our next step should be to try and get the an
> installable build working.  To do this we'd need to:
>
>    1. Modify the pom's so that they're picking up the resources properly
>    and putting them in the jar files.
>    2. Create assemblies that combine the JAR files and the dependencies
>    into a single installable zip file.
>    3. Create the webstart build using the WebStart mojo:
>    http://mojo.codehaus.org/webstart/webstart-maven-plugin/
>    4. Create the Mac build using the Mac/Maven mojo:
>    http://mojo.codehaus.org/osxappbundle-maven-plugin/
>
> It might also be worth taking a look at the IzPack mojo.  This would allow
> us to generate a cross-platform installer, with support for optional module
> downloads and installs.
> http://izpack.codehaus.org/izpack-maven-plugin/index.html
>
> What do you think?
>
> Mark
>
>
> On Tue, Aug 9, 2011 at 12:19 PM, Linus Tolke Tigris <[email protected]>wrote:
>
>> Hello Mark!
>>
>> The work I have done is with almost no maven experience so I will try to
>> understand what you are asking and answer.
>>
>> Let me first describe how it works now.
>>
>> The maven-site job is job with everything. It checks out argouml (and
>> argouml-actionscript3) from trunk and runs maven targets install and site
>> using the file argouml/tools/maven/toppom.xml. This includes running all
>> tests, checkstyle, pmd and findbugs. This also installs the
>> argouml/trunk/pom.xml (argouml-core) in the local repository as a snapshot.
>>
>> The argouml-tools and parentpom jobs just stores their respective poms in
>> the local repository. These poms are used by other jobs.
>>
>> All other maven jobs (argouml-actionscript3, argouml-app,
>> argouml-core-diagrams-activity2, argouml-core-diagrams-class2,
>> argouml-core-diagrams-deployment2, argouml-core-diagrams-sequence2,
>> argouml-core-diagrams-state2, argouml-core-diagrams-structure2,
>> argouml-core-model, argouml-core-model-euml, argouml-core-model-mdr,
>> argouml-core-notation, argouml-core-transformer, and
>> argouml-core-umlpropertypanels) just checks out the specific subproject,
>> fetches libraries from the argouml maven2 repository of released artifacts
>> and fetches poms and newly built snapshot versions of things built by other
>> jobs from the local repository. These uses the install target that runs all
>> tests and installs the resulting jar in the local repository.
>>
>> The Jenkins/Hudson maven plugin has functions that uses the knowledge of
>> things deployed in the local repository to start jobs when dependencies are
>> updated. This can be seen as Upstream projects and Downstream projects on
>> each project. For an example, see
>> http://closettop.homelinux.org:8080/job/argouml-app/.
>>
>> I will now attempt to answer your questions.
>>
>> *How mavenized is the rest of the build currently?*
>> So far my goal has been merely to avoid maintaining tools for the static
>> checks so an update of checkstyle of findbugs will be a simple change in a
>> single file and to use Jenkins reports.
>>  *
>> *
>> *Do you build deployable artifacts?*
>> I am not sure. They are not signed, the build host does not have the key,
>> but they are deployed in the local repository on the build host.*
>>
>> *
>> *Do you build JAR files with maven?*
>> Yes, jar files are installed in the local repository and used by other
>> jobs.
>> *
>> *
>> *Do the JAR files contain the manifest file and appropriate META-INF
>> directories?*
>> I am not sure, I don't think so. I have not bothered about this since the
>> jars in the local repository are only used to build and run tests in other
>> maven jobs.
>> *
>> *
>> *Do you build installable artifacts?*
>>  No.
>> *
>> *
>> *Does the build include assemblies that contain all of the dependent
>> JARs?*
>> No.
>> *
>> *
>> *Does the build create the webstart artifacts, the Mac DMG, and Linux
>> installs?  Have you tried creating RPMs and pkgs for RedHat and Ubuntu
>> respectively?*
>>  No.
>>
>> *Do all the projects have at least a minimal pom file and appropriate
>> references to the parent pom?  I noticed that argo-core-diagrams-uml2
>> didn't, but I don't know if this was intentional or not.*
>>  No, just the projects mentioned above has poms. My plan is to extend this
>> one project at the time but I also get the feeling that it would be good if
>> this could be reviewed by someone with more maven knowledge, like you, to
>> make sure that this is the right direction.
>>
>> *Do the unit tests run, and do you currently generate a report from the
>> unit tests?*
>> Yes, well, the Jenkins/Hudson has its own reports that also has the time
>> dimensions (to see when a test starts to fail and stops failing) see
>> http://closettop.homelinux.org:8080/job/argouml-app/.
>>
>> The maven-site job also runs the mvaen site target to generate the maven
>> site but I see now that there is no rapport from the JUnit tests while the
>> other reports are there. See here:
>> http://closettop.homelinux.org:8080/job/maven-site/site/argouml-app/project-reports.html
>>
>> *Do you currently deploy the artifacts to a mvn repository (like
>> artifactory) so that if you're doing a build of module you don't have to
>> check out all of the other argouml projects?  If it's deployed to a mvn
>> repository, and you do a mvn build, it will download the JARs for
>> argouml-core* and any other dependent projects.  This minimizes the download
>> time, and lets people get up and running fairly quickly.
>> *
>> SNAPSHOT jars are only installed in the local repository on the build host
>> so that the other jobs can benefit from this. Other developers cannot
>> currently benefit from these builds.
>>
>> The java-interfaces jar should be build as a SNAPSHOT and installed in the
>> local repository by a job but I have not dared to run the mdr generation
>> from maven. Instead java-interfaces jar is treated as an external library
>> and taken from the argouml maven2 repository. The antlr builds, I have not
>> dared to address either.
>>
>> In an attempt not to confuse things I have confused things by using
>> different version numbers for the maven-builds SNAPSHOT jars and for the
>> development and stable builds. The maven-builds are only at 0.2. I have
>> attempted to state this version number in as few places as possible. I found
>> a maven discussion post with some pointers to do this.
>>
>>          /Linus
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> 2011/8/9 Mark Fortner <[email protected]>
>>
>>> Hi Linus,
>>> How mavenized is the rest of the build currently?
>>>
>>>    - Do you build deployable artifacts?
>>>       - Do you build JAR files with maven?
>>>       - Do the JAR files contain the manifest file and appropriate
>>>       META-INF directories?
>>>    - Do you build installable artifacts?
>>>       - Does the build include assemblies that contain all of the
>>>       dependent JARs?
>>>       - Does the build create the webstart artifacts, the Mac DMG, and
>>>       Linux installs?  Have you tried creating RPMs and pkgs for RedHat and 
>>> Ubuntu
>>>       respectively?
>>>    - Do all the projects have at least a minimal pom file and
>>>    appropriate references to the parent pom?  I noticed that
>>>    argo-core-diagrams-uml2 didn't, but I don't know if this was intentional 
>>> or
>>>    not.
>>>    - Do the unit tests run, and do you currently generate a report from
>>>    the unit tests?
>>>    - Do you currently deploy the artifacts to a mvn repository (like
>>>    artifactory) so that if you're doing a build of module you don't have to
>>>    check out all of the other argouml projects?  If it's deployed to a mvn
>>>    repository, and you do a mvn build, it will download the JARs for
>>>    argouml-core* and any other dependent projects.  This minimizes the 
>>> download
>>>    time, and lets people get up and running fairly quickly.
>>>
>>> Mark
>>>
>>>
>>> On Fri, Jul 15, 2011 at 4:36 PM, Linus Tolke Tigris <[email protected]>wrote:
>>>
>>>> Hello again Mark!
>>>>
>>>> I think I have solved the checksum problem now. I still get errors that
>>>> the poms are invalid though. I don't understand that problem.
>>>>
>>>>         /Linus
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> 2011/7/16 Mark Fortner <[email protected]>
>>>>
>>>>> Hi Linus,
>>>>> When I do a build, I get messages like this:
>>>>>
>>>>> [WARNING] *** CHECKSUM FAILED - Error retrieving checksum file for
>>>>> org/argouml/argouml-mdr/0.32/argouml-mdr-0.32.jar - IGNORING
>>>>>
>>>>> [WARNING] *** CHECKSUM FAILED - Error retrieving checksum file for
>>>>> org/netbeans/mdr/nbmdr/0.0-5/nbmdr-0.0-5.jar - IGNORING
>>>>>
>>>>> [WARNING] *** CHECKSUM FAILED - Error retrieving checksum file for
>>>>> org/argouml/argouml-mdr/0.32/argouml-mdr-0.32.pom - IGNORING
>>>>> [WARNING] POM for 'org.argouml:argouml-mdr:pom:0.32:test' is invalid.
>>>>>
>>>>> Its dependencies (if any) will NOT be available to the current build.
>>>>> [WARNING] POM for 'org.argouml:java-interfaces:pom:0.32:test' is
>>>>> invalid.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> And a few like this:
>>>>>
>>>>> Downloading:
>>>>> http://argouml-downloads.tigris.org/maven2/org/codehaus/plexus/plexus-containers/1.0-alpha-16/plexus-containers-1.0-alpha-16.pom
>>>>> [INFO] Unable to find resource
>>>>> 'org.codehaus.plexus:plexus-containers:pom:1.0-alpha-16' in repository
>>>>> argouml (http://argouml-downloads.tigris.org/maven2)
>>>>> Downloading:
>>>>> http://repo1.maven.org/maven2/org/codehaus/plexus/plexus-containers/1.0-alpha-16/plexus-containers-1.0-alpha-16.pom
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> The project still builds properly though.
>>>>>
>>>>> Mark
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On Fri, Jul 15, 2011 at 2:52 PM, Linus Tolke Tigris 
>>>>> <[email protected]>wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Hello Mark!
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I think I have understood how to synchronize the version numbers
>>>>>> throughout the maven pom files. It is, however, not synchronized with the
>>>>>> version numbers of the stable and development builds.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> What are the old versions you are referring to? I find the
>>>>>> java-interfaces jar. Is that the one?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> The maven build uses only tools downloaded from maven (with version
>>>>>> specified in the parentpom.xml). No ant files or property files are used 
>>>>>> so
>>>>>> the pom files constitute a complete set of configuration files. As you 
>>>>>> can
>>>>>> see I have managed to get it to build in the Hudson server. What is it 
>>>>>> that
>>>>>> is not working for you?
>>>>>>
>>>>>>       /Linus
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> 2011/7/15 Mark Fortner <[email protected]>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Hi Linus,
>>>>>>> Now that you have the new build machine setup, have you made any
>>>>>>> progress with updating the maven pom files?  There still seem to be a 
>>>>>>> lot of
>>>>>>> references to an old mvn repo, where it tries to download outdated
>>>>>>> artifacts. I did a checkout recently to setup a new machine with 
>>>>>>> argouml and
>>>>>>> I'd forgotten how painful it is to get a argouml into a buildable state.
>>>>>>>  Not to mention the fact that there's a dissertation, and a whole lot of
>>>>>>> tools checked into the svn repo.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Regards,
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Mark
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On Sun, Jun 5, 2011 at 5:54 AM, Linus Tolke Tigris <[email protected]
>>>>>>> > wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Hello all!
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> I have now replaced the old host running the continuous integration
>>>>>>>> and nightly build with a new one. It is a P4 Dual 2.6GHz with 2GB 
>>>>>>>> memory
>>>>>>>> instead of a P2 400MHz with 512M, Ubuntu instead of Debian and Jenkins
>>>>>>>> instead of Hudson. Everything is a lot quicker.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>          /Linus
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>
>

------------------------------------------------------
http://argouml.tigris.org/ds/viewMessage.do?dsForumId=450&dsMessageId=2813188

To unsubscribe from this discussion, e-mail: 
[[email protected]].
To be allowed to post to the list contact the mailing list moderator, email: 
[[email protected]]

Reply via email to