Just one question. On your slides do you imply that the package versions are the same than the bundle version ? It seems to be the case.
On Fri, Feb 4, 2011 at 19:50, zoe slattery <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi - I had a very useful IRC discussion with Guillaume trying to make sure > that we had a common understanding of the versioning policy that is used in > Aries today and the implications of changing it to use OSGi semantic > versioning for packages, and maybe for bundles. > > I believe we agreed that we do not use package versioning correctly at the > moment and, in order to do so, we would have to break the way that that > package versions are derived from bundle versions and manage package > versions independently (manually). > > We didn't agree on the right thing to do with bundle versions (we didn't > disagree either, I just don't know what the right answer is) , in particular > where a module has a set of sub-modules (bundles). The options are either: > > 1) To agree not to follow bundle versioning policy. So all teh submodules > in a module would have teh same bundle version irrespective of whether they > have changed. > 2) To follow it and try and cope with what could become an unholy mess of > bundle versions in the development code base. > > I tried to draw this out in a set of charts, here: > https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/aries/slides/aries-version.odp, and I've > just realised that not everyone will have odp so I'll put a pdf in there > too. > > These are for discussion and illustration of the problem - feed back > welcome. > > > Zoe > > > -- Cheers, Guillaume Nodet ------------------------ Blog: http://gnodet.blogspot.com/ ------------------------ Open Source SOA http://fusesource.com
