+1 Pozdrawiam/Regards, Dominik Przybysz
sob., 2 lut 2019, 07:49: Christian Schneider <[email protected]> napisał(a): > I agree. It is probably easier to first move to git and then archive the > unmaintained projects. > For the project we want to delete I propose we create a branch "attic" or > similar where we keep them and then > delete them from master. > > For the two subprojects to extract I do not know which is the best way. We > could clone the full repo and then delete all that is not part of the > subproject but I do not know if this is very efficient. What do you > propsose there ? > > Christian > > Am Fr., 1. Feb. 2019 um 16:21 Uhr schrieb Jean-Baptiste Onofré < > [email protected]>: > > > Hi > > > > +1 > > > > I think we can move all to git and then split the repository (in two > > steps). > > > > For the project already "isolated", no problem, it's already done ;) > > > > Regards > > JB > > > > On 01/02/2019 15:50, Christian Schneider wrote: > > > We discussed a while ago to move to git and actually have moved quite a > > few > > > of the sub projects. > > > > > > There are some more projects we could move to individual repos as they > > are > > > typcially released by subproject: > > > - component-dsl > > > - cdi > > > > > > So for these I propose we also create individual git repos. > > > > > > Apart from that the remaining projects are too diverse to release by > > > subproject. Still I think moving to git might make sense there. > > > So I wonder if we could simply move the rest of the aries repo to git > and > > > live with the small disadvantage that a tag always also tags unrelated > > > files. > > > > > > Christian > > > > > > > -- > > Jean-Baptiste Onofré > > [email protected] > > http://blog.nanthrax.net > > Talend - http://www.talend.com > > > > > -- > -- > Christian Schneider > http://www.liquid-reality.de > > Computer Scientist > http://www.adobe.com >
