Many thanks Ray,

I totally forgot about that. Let me know if you need help submitting. The
report looks great.

Christian

Am Do., 15. Okt. 2020 um 18:03 Uhr schrieb Raymond Auge
<raymond.a...@liferay.com.invalid>:

> Hey all,
>
> The report is due and I'm willing to submit it (but I've never done it
> before).
>
> This is what I have:
> -------------------------------------------
> ## Description:
> Apache Aries software is a set of pluggable Java components enabling an
> enterprise OSGi application programming model.
>
> ## Issues:
> - the project is blocked in migration from Apache CMS
> - no other issues exist
>
> ## Membership Data:
> Apache Aries was founded 2010-12-14 (10 years ago)
> There are currently 58 committers and 41 PMC members in this project.
> The Committer-to-PMC ratio is roughly 4:3.
>
> Community changes, past quarter:
> - No new PMC members. Last addition was Carlos Sierra Andrés on 2018-07-02.
> - No new committers. Last addition was Romain Manni-Bucau on 2020-01-29.
>
> ## Project Activity:
> - a new sub-component `aries-typedevent` implementing the upcoming R8
>   *OSGi Typed Event Service Specification* has started
> - aries-rsa-1.15.0 is under vote.
> - cdi-1.1.2 release is coming shortly.
> - spifly-1.3.1 was released on 2020-10-15.
> - jax-rs-whiteboard-1.0.10 was released on 2020-10-05.
> - spifly-1.3.0 was released on 2020-05-28.
>
> ## Community Health:
> - defects that are being reported are being handled quickly and efficiently
>   over the past while.
> - the reduction in commits is due to switch from dev of new sub-components
>   toward more maintenance of said components
> - an effort started to migrate the site from the old CMS to some new option
>   (the selected option was "Antora".) The work was started but because the
>    option is not well known and seems to involve a fairly complex setup
> we've
>    hit a sort of roadblock and some uncertainty about direction to take
>    (however the community agrees Aries really needs a new site) This is
>     presently our biggest challenge
> - the large number of sub-components and lack of good website/structured
>   information is making it hard to produce a cohesive view of the
> activities
>   and I feel this contributes to poor awareness/interest
> - project traffic is low but respectable otherwise and most queries from
>   community are answered.
> -------------------------
>
> This ok?
> --
> *Raymond Augé* (@rotty3000)
> Senior Software Architect *Liferay, Inc.* (@Liferay)
> OSGi Fellow
>


-- 
-- 
Christian Schneider
http://www.liquid-reality.de

Computer Scientist
http://www.adobe.com

Reply via email to