It's rc1 because we started with rc0. 0-indexing ;)
On Wed, May 3, 2017, at 06:00 PM, Gang(Gary) Wang wrote: > +1 (non-binding) LGTM, wonder why still rc1 ? Thanks. > > Gary > > On Tue, May 2, 2017 at 1:46 PM, Wes McKinney <wesmck...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > Hello all, > > > > I'd like to propose the 2nd release candidate (rc1) of Apache Arrow version > > 0.3.0. It covers a total of 263 resolved JIRAs [1] Thanks to everyone who > > contributed to this release. > > > > The source release rc1 is hosted at [2]. > > This release candidate is based on commit > > d8db8f8a11abbbb6c45645b2d7370610311731bd located at [3]. > > > > The vote will be open for the next ~72 hours ending at 16:45 Eastern US > > Time, > > May 5, 2017. > > > > [ ] +1 > > [ ] +0 > > [ ] -1 > > > > I have > > > > * Built Java libraries and run unit tests > > * Built and installed C++ and Python libraries on Ubuntu 14.04 (gcc 4.8), > > and > > run unit tests > > * Built and installed C++ and Python libraries on Visual Studio 2015, and > > run > > unit tests > > * Run the Java<->C++ integration tests for the stream and file formats > > * Build and installed C GLib bindings. The tarball does not include the > > test > > suite; it would be good to provide a way to validate the build from a > > source > > release > > > > Here's my vote: +1 (binding) > > > > Thanks, > > Wes > > > > How to validate a release signature: > > https://httpd.apache.org/dev/verification.html > > > > [1]: > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?jql=project%20% > > 3D%20ARROW%20AND%20status%20in%20(Resolved%2C%20Closed)% > > 20AND%20fixVersion%20%3D%200.3.0 > > [2] *https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/arrow/apache-arrow-0.3.0-rc1/ > > <https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/arrow/apache-arrow-0.3.0-rc1/>* > > [3] > > * > > https://github.com/apache/arrow/tree/d8db8f8a11abbbb6c45645b2d73706 > > 10311731bd > > < > > https://github.com/apache/arrow/tree/d8db8f8a11abbbb6c45645b2d73706 > > 10311731bd > > >* > >
