OK, I believe we are all set with the alignment patch in https://github.com/apache/arrow/pull/954 if anyone wants to take a last look.
I have one last Python issue that needs to be closed out, but barring new developments, we should be able to start a 0.6.0 vote tomorrow morning. On Tue, Aug 8, 2017 at 2:08 PM, Wes McKinney <wesmck...@gmail.com> wrote: > In light of the mailing list discussion about buffer alignment in > distributed stream construction (see ARROW-1343 and the mailing list > discussion), I am going to hold off on cutting an RC until we can > reach a resolution there. Otherwise things seem to be in good shape. > > Thanks > Wes > > On Mon, Aug 7, 2017 at 10:38 AM, Wes McKinney <wesmck...@gmail.com> wrote: >> hi all, >> >> It looks like we should be able to close out 0.6.0 issues today and >> cut a release candidate tomorrow if there are no objections. Please >> take a moment to complete any code reviews for patches that should go >> in. We have a number of Java library dependency upgrades pending, do >> these need to go in? >> >> https://github.com/apache/arrow/pull/929 >> https://github.com/apache/arrow/pull/873 >> >> There is another Java patch that needs to be merged if someone could review: >> >> https://github.com/apache/arrow/pull/898 >> >> There are a handful of C++ or Python patches pending, and I'll be >> opening a few more PRs today; any code reviews would be appreciated. >> >> Thanks >> Wes >> >> On Fri, Aug 4, 2017 at 3:57 PM, Siddharth Teotia <siddha...@dremio.com> >> wrote: >>> Reviewed https://github.com/apache/arrow/pull/915 for ARROW-1296 >>> >>> >>> On Fri, Aug 4, 2017 at 11:45 AM, Siddharth Teotia <siddha...@dremio.com> >>> wrote: >>> >>>> I will review it by EOD. >>>> >>>> On Fri, Aug 4, 2017 at 11:15 AM, Li Jin <ice.xell...@gmail.com> wrote: >>>> >>>>> On the Java side I have https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ARROW-1296, >>>>> which is small bug fix. >>>>> >>>>> If someone help review it would be great. Else if it doesn't get reviewed >>>>> by 0.6 rc cut, we can take it off 0.6 release. >>>>> >>>>> Li >>>>> >>>>> On Fri, Aug 4, 2017 at 2:02 PM, Wes McKinney <wesmck...@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>> >>>>> > hi all, >>>>> > >>>>> > If there are no problems with the Plasma IP Clearance, I would like to >>>>> > cut a release candidate for 0.6.0 at the beginning of next week. There >>>>> > are a handful of issues pending on the Java and C++ side that I'll be >>>>> > working to complete over the next several days. Please keep an eye on >>>>> > the release page on JIRA: >>>>> > >>>>> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/projects/ARROW/versions/12341088 >>>>> > >>>>> > There are a number of outstanding Java patches; if you would like to >>>>> > include any of these in the 0.6.0 release, could someone review? >>>>> > >>>>> > Thanks, >>>>> > Wes >>>>> > >>>>> > On Tue, Aug 1, 2017 at 10:59 PM, Wes McKinney <wesmck...@gmail.com> >>>>> wrote: >>>>> > > It seems that ARROW-1282 is causing some users problems. We have the >>>>> > > option of making a 0.5.1 release, but given how much work has reached >>>>> > > master (or is about to reach master) I would be in favor of >>>>> > > accelerating 0.6.0, cutting a release candidate within the next couple >>>>> > > of days. We could aim for another release within 2-3 weeks after >>>>> > > completing the Plasma IP clearance. >>>>> > > >>>>> > > Thoughts? >>>>> > > >>>>> > > On Tue, Aug 1, 2017 at 9:44 AM, Uwe L. Korn <uw...@xhochy.com> wrote: >>>>> > >> Hello, >>>>> > >> >>>>> > >> from my side we're mostly fine for a 0.6.0 release. Currently I'm >>>>> facing >>>>> > >> a problem with https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ARROW-1302 in >>>>> the >>>>> > >> 0.5.0 OSX wheels. We need to fix this before 0.6.0. Also I would >>>>> like to >>>>> > >> look a bit more into the jemalloc issues that came up with 0.5.0 to >>>>> get >>>>> > >> some of them solved in the next release. >>>>> > >> >>>>> > >> Uwe >>>>> > >> >>>>> > >> On Mon, Jul 31, 2017, at 04:55 PM, Wes McKinney wrote: >>>>> > >>> hi all, >>>>> > >>> >>>>> > >>> We're already 40 patches into the next Arrow version. I just created >>>>> > >>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ARROW-1297 as a tracking >>>>> issue >>>>> > >>> so that any blocking issues can be tracked as we push forward to >>>>> 0.6.0 >>>>> > >>> >>>>> > >>> You can track the status of the release here (accessible from the >>>>> > >>> "Projects" tab --> Releases in JIRA): >>>>> > >>> >>>>> > >>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/projects/ARROW/versions/12341088 >>>>> > >>> >>>>> > >>> We don't have any more data types slated for integration testing for >>>>> > >>> this release, but it might be nice to try to finish one or more of >>>>> > >>> them in the next week or two: >>>>> > >>> >>>>> > >>> - Fixed size binary >>>>> > >>> - Fixed size lists >>>>> > >>> - Decimal >>>>> > >>> - Union >>>>> > >>> >>>>> > >>> As far as timeline for 0.6.0, I would like to push for an RC the >>>>> week >>>>> > >>> of 8/14 at latest (assuming we are ready to ship the Plasma C++ >>>>> code), >>>>> > >>> reducing scope if needed. Any contributions of code, documentation, >>>>> or >>>>> > >>> JIRA prioritization would be much appreciated. >>>>> > >>> >>>>> > >>> Thanks, >>>>> > >>> Wes >>>>> > >>>>> >>>> >>>>
