It doesn't look like I'll have any time to work on this before the 0.9 release so will target for the next one. Wes, it sounds like it could fit into type annotations, but I'm not quite sure how that will all fit together so I'll try to follow along in that discussion.
On Thu, Feb 22, 2018 at 4:31 PM, Wes McKinney <wesmck...@gmail.com> wrote: > Aside: we should try to settle the discussion we started on the sync > call regarding type annotations -- it may make sense for Map to be an > annotation for List<Struct<...>>, but we will need to discuss in some > more detail. > > On Thu, Feb 22, 2018 at 10:01 AM, Li Jin <ice.xell...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Brian, > > > > I think it's ok to implement MapVector now. > > > > On Wed, Feb 21, 2018 at 12:07 PM, Bryan Cutler <cutl...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > > >> I can't make the sync today, but I did want to ask if everyone is ok > with > >> implementing the MapType in Java, which would add the MapVector class. > Is > >> this something we can do now or do we want to wait until the next > release > >> to give time for the previous rename to settle? Thanks! > >> >
