This should fix it: https://github.com/apache/arrow/pull/1751 <https://github.com/apache/arrow/pull/1751>
> On Mar 14, 2018, at 6:42 PM, Wes McKinney <wesmck...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Last item https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ARROW-2312 > > I can start the release vote as soon as we have the release > verification script working again > > On Wed, Mar 14, 2018 at 2:28 PM, Wes McKinney <wesmck...@gmail.com> wrote: >> OK, patch is up for ARROW-2307: >> https://github.com/apache/arrow/pull/1747. Once that is reviewed and >> merged I will start the release vote >> >> On Wed, Mar 14, 2018 at 10:18 AM, Wes McKinney <wesmck...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> I'm going to have a look at ARROW-2307 to see if it's an easy fix. If >>> not, I will go ahead with the RC >>> >>> On Wed, Mar 14, 2018 at 7:36 AM, Uwe L. Korn <uw...@xhochy.com> wrote: >>>> The mentioned bugfixes were merged and I also tested the >>>> Arrow<->Parquet-cpp as well as the Arrow<->Dask(parquet) integration. Both >>>> seem to work fine. From my side it looks like we're ready to make an RC. >>>> >>>> Uwe >>>> >>>> On Wed, Mar 14, 2018, at 5:07 AM, Wes McKinney wrote: >>>>> I fixed these bugs >>>>> >>>>> https://github.com/apache/arrow/pull/1742 >>>>> https://github.com/apache/arrow/pull/1743 >>>>> >>>>> As soon as these patches go in, we can cut the RC0. I can do this as >>>>> soon as tomorrow (Wednesday) morning >>>>> >>>>> On Tue, Mar 13, 2018 at 5:00 PM, Wes McKinney <wesmck...@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>> I found 2 bugs -- ARROW-2304 and ARROW-2306 -- while doing some final >>>>>> testing of master (stuff we haven't been testing in CI -- we _really_ >>>>>> need to set up nightly CI jobs for more time consuming tests, like >>>>>> HDFS, that we want to test periodically but perhaps not on every >>>>>> commit). I'm going to see if these are easy to fix >>>>>> >>>>>> On Tue, Mar 13, 2018 at 11:21 AM, Wes McKinney <wesmck...@gmail.com> >>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>> I fixed ARROW-2227 in https://github.com/apache/arrow/pull/1740, so if >>>>>>> someone could review that would be great. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> I am going to make sure the C++/Python HDFS tests run locally, then >>>>>>> after the patch above is merged we should be good to make the RC. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Note to other onlookers -- please feel free to keep writing new >>>>>>> patches not mentioned here. They may just have to go in to the next >>>>>>> release >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Thanks >>>>>>> Wes >>>>>>> >>>>>>> On Tue, Mar 13, 2018 at 12:56 AM, Wes McKinney <wesmck...@gmail.com> >>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>> Things are looking pretty good. I'm waiting on a build for ARROW-1643 >>>>>>>> to go in, and there's a last blocker bug (ARROW-2227) that we ought to >>>>>>>> try to fix tomorrow before cutting the RC. I can start the vote after >>>>>>>> that if nothing else comes up >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> I created ARROW-2300 in the course of trying to test ARROW-1643. I >>>>>>>> have an alternative way to run the HDFS tests (since we aren't running >>>>>>>> them in Travis CI) so most likely I will try out the HDFS tests and >>>>>>>> then move ARROW-2300 to the next release milestone. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Thanks >>>>>>>> Wes >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> On Mon, Mar 12, 2018 at 12:03 AM, Wes McKinney <wesmck...@gmail.com> >>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>> I've done a pass over the remaining JIRAs -- I think we're going to >>>>>>>>> need at least another full day to get things buttoned up, so I would >>>>>>>>> say we're looking at an RC on Tuesday. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> In progress: >>>>>>>>> - ARROW-1425: Patch up, needs some editing, may be moved to 0.10.0 >>>>>>>>> - ARROW-2282: Patch up, needs some test cases >>>>>>>>> - ARROW-1974: Patch in review in apache/parquet-cpp -- may want to >>>>>>>>> move this JIRA to the Parquet project >>>>>>>>> - ARROW-2122: Patch to be reviewed >>>>>>>>> - ARROW-2135: Patch to be merged >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> TODO >>>>>>>>> - ARROW-2082: Parquet segfault <- to be investigated, may be moved to >>>>>>>>> 0.10.0 >>>>>>>>> - ARROW-2118: Fix rough edge with reading length-0 files >>>>>>>>> - ARROW-2227: Bug with creating chunked arrays in Table.from_pandas >>>>>>>>> - ARROW-2292: Deprecation / renaming a Python method >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Out of the two items in TODO, ARROW-2118 and ARROW-2292 are small >>>>>>>>> matters, so I will take care of them. ARROW-2227 may not be fixable >>>>>>>>> within ~1 day but it would be useful to have a diagnosis in case the >>>>>>>>> fix is easy -- multiple users hit this bug. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Thanks, >>>>>>>>> Wes >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> On Thu, Mar 8, 2018 at 8:47 PM, Kouhei Sutou <k...@clear-code.com> >>>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>>> Thanks! >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> -- >>>>>>>>>> kou >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> In >>>>>>>>>> <cajpuwmbsxxw9-8vrj3xwud_p3y7sosdmc6xc53pkrjusewm...@mail.gmail.com> >>>>>>>>>> "Re: Working towards getting 0.9.0 release candidate up next week" >>>>>>>>>> on Thu, 8 Mar 2018 20:44:14 -0500, >>>>>>>>>> Wes McKinney <wesmck...@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> hi Kou -- yes, I think this is a good idea. It will require a little >>>>>>>>>>> bit of work to be able to produce a viable standalone source >>>>>>>>>>> tarball. >>>>>>>>>>> Between Uwe, Phillip, Antoine, and I, we should be able to come up >>>>>>>>>>> with a plan to do this >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> - Wes >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> On Thu, Mar 8, 2018 at 8:33 PM, Kouhei Sutou <k...@clear-code.com> >>>>>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>> Hi, >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> - Updating pip packages for C++ and Python >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> Can we try adding PyArrow source package to PyPI at the >>>>>>>>>>>> 0.9.0? >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> I want to install PyArrow with Arrow C++ installed by .deb >>>>>>>>>>>> or .rpm. I want to use both Red Arrow (Ruby bindings) and >>>>>>>>>>>> PyArrow in the same process via PyCall (Ruby library >>>>>>>>>>>> to integrate with Python). In the case, I need to use the >>>>>>>>>>>> same Arrow C++ in both Red Arrow and PyArrow. >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> Now, there are only binary packages for PyArrow at >>>>>>>>>>>> https://pypi.python.org/pypi/pyarrow . If there is a source >>>>>>>>>>>> package for PyArrow at PyPI, I can install PyArrow with >>>>>>>>>>>> Arrow C++ installed by .deb or .rpm by "pip --no-binary >>>>>>>>>>>> pyarrow". >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> Red Arrow can also use Arrow C++ installed by .deb or .rpm. >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks, >>>>>>>>>>>> -- >>>>>>>>>>>> kou >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> In >>>>>>>>>>>> <cakhw1aqgv7sn70jewe5qmw00yevx_xg_zjinywgbo00+c4k...@mail.gmail.com> >>>>>>>>>>>> "Re: Working towards getting 0.9.0 release candidate up next >>>>>>>>>>>> week" on Thu, 8 Mar 2018 11:25:32 -0800, >>>>>>>>>>>> Siddharth Teotia <siddha...@dremio.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> All, >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> I plan to get RC out over the weekend or early Monday. Is that >>>>>>>>>>>>> fine with >>>>>>>>>>>>> everybody? >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> We have 6 items in progress -- >>>>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/projects/ARROW/versions/12341707#release-report-tab-body. >>>>>>>>>>>>> How do people feel about completing these JIRAs by tomorrow? I am >>>>>>>>>>>>> completely fine with deferring the RC to early next week >>>>>>>>>>>>> (Mon/Tue/Wed) if >>>>>>>>>>>>> necessary. Just looking for consensus. Also, I suggest that we >>>>>>>>>>>>> defer the >>>>>>>>>>>>> ones with TODO status. I will do it later today unless I hear >>>>>>>>>>>>> otherwise. >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> I was wondering if anyone else is interested in collaborating for >>>>>>>>>>>>> the >>>>>>>>>>>>> post-release tasks. As per >>>>>>>>>>>>> https://github.com/apache/arrow/blob/master/dev/release/RELEASE_MANAGEMENT.md, >>>>>>>>>>>>> following are the high level post-release tasks. Please let me >>>>>>>>>>>>> know if you >>>>>>>>>>>>> would like to take up something. I have written my name against >>>>>>>>>>>>> some of >>>>>>>>>>>>> them. >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> - Updating the Arrow Website (Sidd) >>>>>>>>>>>>> - Uploading release artifacts to SVN -- looks like PMC karma is >>>>>>>>>>>>> needed >>>>>>>>>>>>> to do this >>>>>>>>>>>>> - Announcing release (Sidd) >>>>>>>>>>>>> - Updating website with new API documentation (Sidd) >>>>>>>>>>>>> - Updating pip packages for C++ and Python >>>>>>>>>>>>> - Updating conda packages for C++ and Python (Sidd) >>>>>>>>>>>>> - Updating Java Maven artifacts in Maven central (Sidd) >>>>>>>>>>>>> - Release blog post >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> If anything is missing, please add to the above list. It will be >>>>>>>>>>>>> helpful >>>>>>>>>>>>> for tracking. >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks, >>>>>>>>>>>>> Sidd >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> On Sun, Mar 4, 2018 at 12:34 PM, Wes McKinney >>>>>>>>>>>>> <wesmck...@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> hey Sidd, >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> The Python backlog is still in pretty rough shape. I'd like to >>>>>>>>>>>>>> see if >>>>>>>>>>>>>> we can make an RC by Friday but if not we can defer to >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Monday/Tuesday >>>>>>>>>>>>>> the following week (3/12 or 13). I will trim as much as possible >>>>>>>>>>>>>> out >>>>>>>>>>>>>> of the current backlog to get things down to the essential >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> - Wes >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Sun, Feb 25, 2018 at 11:58 AM, Siddharth Teotia >>>>>>>>>>>>>> <siddha...@dremio.com> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Sounds good. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Sidd >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Feb 24, 2018 6:24 PM, "Wes McKinney" <wesmck...@gmail.com> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi Sidd, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I think we have too many bugs to make an RC this coming week. I >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> suggest >>>>>>>>>>>>>> we >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> defer to the following week. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Wes >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Feb 24, 2018 7:09 PM, "Siddharth Teotia" >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <siddha...@dremio.com> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi All, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> We currently have 10 issues in progress and PRs are available >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> for 8 of >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> them. In interest of getting a release candidate next week, I >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> would >>>>>>>>>>>>>> request >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> people to review PRs as soon as they can to help make progress >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and close >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> out as many JIRAs as we can. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> There are 32 issues in TODO list and 25 of them are not yet >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> assigned. I >>>>>>>>>>>>>> am >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> planning to defer some of the unassigned ones later today or >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> tomorrow. It >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> would be good to soon grab/assign the issues that people want >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to be fixed >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> for 0.9.0. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Here is the link to backlog: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/projects/ARROW/versions/12341707 >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Sidd >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
