Yes, as soon as the initial R PR is in (and the CI scripts aren't changing)
the build will be faster.

@Romain how much more work do you want to do on the initial PR? We can
review and merge by end of week if that sounds good

On Thu, Sep 6, 2018 at 6:10 AM Uwe L. Korn <uw...@xhochy.com> wrote:

> The problem could be that it checks against master and you will probably
> have changes for R in the ci/ directory. Changes in that directory will
> trigger a build for the full matrix. So to get the build simple and fast,
> we should get the ci/ changes for R into master soon.
>
> Uwe
>
> On Thu, Sep 6, 2018, at 3:04 PM, Antoine Pitrou wrote:
> >
> > Le 06/09/2018 à 15:03, Romain François a écrit :
> > > I must do something wrong then because it builds them all, all the
> time 🤷‍♂️.
> >
> > Can you show an example?
> >
> >
> > >
> > > Not a big deal, it’s only about 10 jobs, and i really only care about
> the r job and the only doing the 🐀 analysis.
> > >
> > > Commenting out may not be very practical as the plan is to submit
> small pull requests, so it’s almost guaranteed i’ll forget to uncomment
> about 50% of the time.
> > >
> > >> Le 6 sept. 2018 à 14:48, Antoine Pitrou <anto...@python.org> a écrit
> :
> > >>
> > >>
> > >> Our CI harness will already fast-exit in jobs that are not affected by
> > >> the current changes (if you change only the R directory, C++ jobs will
> > >> exit early).
> > >>
> > >> If you want it to be even faster, your best bet is to temporarily
> > >> comment out job entries in .travis.yml.
> > >>
> > >> Regards
> > >>
> > >> Antoine.
> > >>
> > >>
> > >>> Le 06/09/2018 à 14:26, Romain François a écrit :
> > >>> Hello,
> > >>>
> > >>> Is there a way to have a lighter build matrix on travis, perhaps
> based on the branch name, for example when working on the r bindings and
> not touching anything else, having only the r job to be triggered would
> make it faster for travis.
> > >>>
> > >>> For example when working on r features i would typically start the
> branch name with « r-»
> > >>>
> > >>> Romain
> > >>>
> > >
>

Reply via email to