Hello,

https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ARROW-3578 is something that needs to be 
fixed upstream in RAT. The only thing for Arrow is then to update the RAT 
version.

With the RC date at the end of the week, I sadly cannot be release manager as 
I'm not sure about my availability from next week on.

Uwe

On Tue, Mar 19, 2019, at 11:59 AM, Antoine Pitrou wrote:
> 
> I'd suggest to concentrate on bug fixes instead (especially as there
> seems to be a Rust blocker).  New features can wait for 0.14.
> 
> Regards
> 
> Antoine.
> 
> 
> Le 19/03/2019 à 11:50, Neville Dipale a écrit :
> > When is the cut-off for PRs? We have a public holiday on Thursday, and I
> > want to use that to finish off my work on array casting.
> > 
> > If that'll be too late I can defer to the next release.
> > 
> > On Tue, 19 Mar 2019, 12:34 Antoine Pitrou, <anto...@python.org> wrote:
> > 
> >>
> >> The only potential blocker from my POV is
> >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ARROW-3578, but we've already
> >> lived with it for previous releases, so perhaps it's ok anyway?
> >>
> >> Regards
> >>
> >> Antoine.
> >>
> >>
> >> Le 19/03/2019 à 02:51, Wes McKinney a écrit :
> >>> hi folks,
> >>>
> >>> I think we're basically at the 0.13 end game here. There's some more
> >>> patches can get in, but do we all think we can cut an RC by the end of
> >>> the week? What are the blocking issues?
> >>>
> >>> Thanks
> >>> Wes
> >>>
> >>> On Sat, Mar 16, 2019 at 9:57 PM Kouhei Sutou <k...@clear-code.com> wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>> Hi,
> >>>>
> >>>>> Submitted the packaging builds:
> >>>>>
> >> https://github.com/kszucs/crossbow/branches/all?utf8=%E2%9C%93&query=build-452
> >>>>
> >>>> I've fixed .deb/.rpm packages:
> >> https://github.com/apache/arrow/pull/3934
> >>>> It has been merged.
> >>>> So .deb/.rpm packages are ready for release.
> >>>>
> >>>> Thanks,
> >>>> --
> >>>> kou
> >>>>
> >>>> In <cahm19a5somzxgcphc6ee-mr2usvvhwb252udgjrvocq-cb2...@mail.gmail.com>
> >>>>   "Re: Timeline for 0.13 Arrow release" on Thu, 14 Mar 2019 16:24:43
> >> +0100,
> >>>>   Krisztián Szűcs <szucs.kriszt...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>>> Submitted the packaging builds:
> >>>>>
> >> https://github.com/kszucs/crossbow/branches/all?utf8=%E2%9C%93&query=build-452
> >>>>>
> >>>>> On Thu, Mar 14, 2019 at 4:19 PM Wes McKinney <wesmck...@gmail.com>
> >> wrote:
> >>>>>
> >>>>>> The CMake refactor is merged! Kudos to Uwe for 3+ weeks of hard labor
> >> on
> >>>>>> this.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> We should run all the packaging tasks and get a full accounting of
> >>>>>> what is broken so we aren't surprised during the release process
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> On Wed, Mar 13, 2019 at 9:39 AM Krisztián Szűcs
> >>>>>> <szucs.kriszt...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> The proof of the pudding is in the eating. You convinced me.
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> On Wed, Mar 13, 2019 at 3:31 PM Wes McKinney <wesmck...@gmail.com>
> >>>>>> wrote:
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> Krisztian -- are you all right with proceeding with merging the
> >> CMake
> >>>>>>>> refactor? I'm pretty committed to helping fix the problems that come
> >>>>>>>> up. Since most consumers of the project don't test until _after_ a
> >>>>>>>> release, we won't find out about some problems until we merge it and
> >>>>>>>> release it. Thus, IMHO it doesn't make sense to wait another 8-10
> >>>>>>>> weeks since we'd be delaying feedback for that long. There are also
> >> a
> >>>>>>>> number of follow-on issues blocking on the refactor
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> On Tue, Mar 12, 2019 at 11:39 AM Andy Grove <andygrov...@gmail.com>
> >>>>>> wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> I've cleaned up my issues for Rust, moving most of them to 0.14.0.
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> I have two PRs in progress that I would appreciate reviews on:
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> https://github.com/apache/arrow/pull/3671 - [Rust] Table API
> >> (a.k.a
> >>>>>>>>> DataFrame)
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> https://github.com/apache/arrow/pull/3851 - [Rust] Parquet data
> >>>>>> source
> >>>>>>>> in
> >>>>>>>>> DataFusion
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> Once these are merged I have some small follow up PRs for 0.13.0
> >>>>>> that I
> >>>>>>>> can
> >>>>>>>>> get done this week.
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> Thanks,
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> Andy.
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> On Tue, Mar 12, 2019 at 8:21 AM Wes McKinney <wesmck...@gmail.com>
> >>>>>>>> wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> hi folks,
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> I think we are on track to be able to release toward the end of
> >>>>>> this
> >>>>>>>>>> month. My proposed timeline:
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> * This week (March 11-15): feature/improvement push mostly
> >>>>>>>>>> * Next week (March 18-22): shift to bug fixes, stabilization,
> >> empty
> >>>>>>>>>> backlog of feature/improvement JIRAs
> >>>>>>>>>> * Week of March 25: propose release candidate
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> Does this seem reasonable? This puts us at about 9-10 weeks from
> >>>>>> 0.12.
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> We need an RM for 0.13, any PMCs want to volunteer?
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> Take a look at our release page:
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/pages/viewpage.action?pageId=103091219
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> Out of the open or in-progress issues, we have:
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> * C#: 3 issues
> >>>>>>>>>> * C++ (all components): 51 issues
> >>>>>>>>>> * Java: 3 issues
> >>>>>>>>>> * Python: 38 issues
> >>>>>>>>>> * Rust (all components): 33 issues
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> Please help curating the backlogs for each component. There's a
> >>>>>>>>>> smattering of issues in other categories. There are also 10 open
> >>>>>>>>>> issues with No Component (and 20 resolved issues), those need
> >> their
> >>>>>>>>>> metadata fixed.
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> Thanks,
> >>>>>>>>>> Wes
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> On Wed, Feb 27, 2019 at 1:49 PM Wes McKinney <wesmck...@gmail.com
> >>>
> >>>>>>>> wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>> The timeline for the 0.13 release is drawing closer. I would say
> >>>>>> we
> >>>>>>>>>>> should consider a release candidate either the week of March 18
> >>>>>> or
> >>>>>>>>>>> March 25, which gives us ~3 weeks to close out backlog items.
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>> There are around 220 issues open or in-progress in
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>
> >> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/ARROW/Arrow+0.13.0+Release
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>> Please have a look. If issues are not assigned to someone as the
> >>>>>> next
> >>>>>>>>>>> couple of weeks pass by I'll begin moving at least C++ and Python
> >>>>>>>>>>> issues to 0.14 that don't seem like they're going to get done for
> >>>>>>>>>>> 0.13. If development stakeholders for C#, Java, Rust, Ruby, and
> >>>>>> other
> >>>>>>>>>>> components can review and curate the issues that would be
> >>>>>> helpful.
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>> You can help keep the JIRA issues tidy by making sure to add Fix
> >>>>>>>>>>> Version to issues and to make sure to add a Component so that
> >>>>>> issues
> >>>>>>>>>>> are properly categorized in the release notes.
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>> Thanks
> >>>>>>>>>>> Wes
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>> On Sat, Feb 9, 2019 at 10:39 AM Wes McKinney <
> >>>>>> wesmck...@gmail.com>
> >>>>>>>>>> wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>> See
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/ARROW/Release+Management+Guide
> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>> The source release step is one of the places where problems
> >>>>>> occur.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>> On Sat, Feb 9, 2019, 10:33 AM <ane...@quiltdata.io wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Feb 8, 2019, at 9:19 AM, Uwe L. Korn <m...@uwekorn.com>
> >>>>>>>> wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> We could dockerize some of the release steps to ensure that
> >>>>>> they
> >>>>>>>>>> run in the same environment.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> I may be able to help with said Dockerization. If not for this
> >>>>>>>>>> release, then for the next. Are there docs on which systems we
> >>>>>> wish to
> >>>>>>>>>> target and/or any build steps beyond the current dev container (
> >>>>>>>>>> https://github.com/apache/arrow/tree/master/dev/container)?
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>
> > 
>

Reply via email to