Hi Kou,

What should be the policy for merges until 0.13.0 is released?
Do you want to instate a feature freeze or commit freeze?

Regards

Antoine.


Le 19/03/2019 à 15:46, Kouhei Sutou a écrit :
> Hi,
> 
> There are no blockers on GLib, Ruby and Linux packages.
> 
> Can we include JavaScript into 0.13.0?
> If we include JavaScript into 0.13.0, we can remove
> codes to release JavaScript separately. For example, we can
> remove dev/release/js-*. We can enable version update code
> in dev/release/00-prepare.sh:
> https://github.com/apache/arrow/blob/master/dev/release/00-prepare.sh#L67-L74
> 
> We can merge "JavaScript Releases" document into our release
> document:
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/ARROW/Release+Management+Guide#ReleaseManagementGuide-JavaScriptReleases
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> --
> kou
> 
> In <cajpuwmbgjzbwrwybwse6bd9lnn_7xozn_aq2job9_mpvmhc...@mail.gmail.com>
>   "Re: Timeline for 0.13 Arrow release" on Mon, 18 Mar 2019 20:51:12 -0500,
>   Wes McKinney <wesmck...@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
>> hi folks,
>>
>> I think we're basically at the 0.13 end game here. There's some more
>> patches can get in, but do we all think we can cut an RC by the end of
>> the week? What are the blocking issues?
>>
>> Thanks
>> Wes
>>
>> On Sat, Mar 16, 2019 at 9:57 PM Kouhei Sutou <k...@clear-code.com> wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>>> Submitted the packaging builds:
>>>> https://github.com/kszucs/crossbow/branches/all?utf8=%E2%9C%93&query=build-452
>>>
>>> I've fixed .deb/.rpm packages: https://github.com/apache/arrow/pull/3934
>>> It has been merged.
>>> So .deb/.rpm packages are ready for release.
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>> --
>>> kou
>>>
>>> In <cahm19a5somzxgcphc6ee-mr2usvvhwb252udgjrvocq-cb2...@mail.gmail.com>
>>>   "Re: Timeline for 0.13 Arrow release" on Thu, 14 Mar 2019 16:24:43 +0100,
>>>   Krisztián Szűcs <szucs.kriszt...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Submitted the packaging builds:
>>>> https://github.com/kszucs/crossbow/branches/all?utf8=%E2%9C%93&query=build-452
>>>>
>>>> On Thu, Mar 14, 2019 at 4:19 PM Wes McKinney <wesmck...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> The CMake refactor is merged! Kudos to Uwe for 3+ weeks of hard labor on
>>>>> this.
>>>>>
>>>>> We should run all the packaging tasks and get a full accounting of
>>>>> what is broken so we aren't surprised during the release process
>>>>>
>>>>> On Wed, Mar 13, 2019 at 9:39 AM Krisztián Szűcs
>>>>> <szucs.kriszt...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> The proof of the pudding is in the eating. You convinced me.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Wed, Mar 13, 2019 at 3:31 PM Wes McKinney <wesmck...@gmail.com>
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Krisztian -- are you all right with proceeding with merging the CMake
>>>>>>> refactor? I'm pretty committed to helping fix the problems that come
>>>>>>> up. Since most consumers of the project don't test until _after_ a
>>>>>>> release, we won't find out about some problems until we merge it and
>>>>>>> release it. Thus, IMHO it doesn't make sense to wait another 8-10
>>>>>>> weeks since we'd be delaying feedback for that long. There are also a
>>>>>>> number of follow-on issues blocking on the refactor
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On Tue, Mar 12, 2019 at 11:39 AM Andy Grove <andygrov...@gmail.com>
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> I've cleaned up my issues for Rust, moving most of them to 0.14.0.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> I have two PRs in progress that I would appreciate reviews on:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> https://github.com/apache/arrow/pull/3671 - [Rust] Table API (a.k.a
>>>>>>>> DataFrame)
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> https://github.com/apache/arrow/pull/3851 - [Rust] Parquet data
>>>>> source
>>>>>>> in
>>>>>>>> DataFusion
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Once these are merged I have some small follow up PRs for 0.13.0
>>>>> that I
>>>>>>> can
>>>>>>>> get done this week.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Andy.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On Tue, Mar 12, 2019 at 8:21 AM Wes McKinney <wesmck...@gmail.com>
>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> hi folks,
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> I think we are on track to be able to release toward the end of
>>>>> this
>>>>>>>>> month. My proposed timeline:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> * This week (March 11-15): feature/improvement push mostly
>>>>>>>>> * Next week (March 18-22): shift to bug fixes, stabilization, empty
>>>>>>>>> backlog of feature/improvement JIRAs
>>>>>>>>> * Week of March 25: propose release candidate
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Does this seem reasonable? This puts us at about 9-10 weeks from
>>>>> 0.12.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> We need an RM for 0.13, any PMCs want to volunteer?
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Take a look at our release page:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/pages/viewpage.action?pageId=103091219
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Out of the open or in-progress issues, we have:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> * C#: 3 issues
>>>>>>>>> * C++ (all components): 51 issues
>>>>>>>>> * Java: 3 issues
>>>>>>>>> * Python: 38 issues
>>>>>>>>> * Rust (all components): 33 issues
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Please help curating the backlogs for each component. There's a
>>>>>>>>> smattering of issues in other categories. There are also 10 open
>>>>>>>>> issues with No Component (and 20 resolved issues), those need their
>>>>>>>>> metadata fixed.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>>>>>> Wes
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> On Wed, Feb 27, 2019 at 1:49 PM Wes McKinney <wesmck...@gmail.com>
>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> The timeline for the 0.13 release is drawing closer. I would say
>>>>> we
>>>>>>>>>> should consider a release candidate either the week of March 18
>>>>> or
>>>>>>>>>> March 25, which gives us ~3 weeks to close out backlog items.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> There are around 220 issues open or in-progress in
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/ARROW/Arrow+0.13.0+Release
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Please have a look. If issues are not assigned to someone as the
>>>>> next
>>>>>>>>>> couple of weeks pass by I'll begin moving at least C++ and Python
>>>>>>>>>> issues to 0.14 that don't seem like they're going to get done for
>>>>>>>>>> 0.13. If development stakeholders for C#, Java, Rust, Ruby, and
>>>>> other
>>>>>>>>>> components can review and curate the issues that would be
>>>>> helpful.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> You can help keep the JIRA issues tidy by making sure to add Fix
>>>>>>>>>> Version to issues and to make sure to add a Component so that
>>>>> issues
>>>>>>>>>> are properly categorized in the release notes.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Thanks
>>>>>>>>>> Wes
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> On Sat, Feb 9, 2019 at 10:39 AM Wes McKinney <
>>>>> wesmck...@gmail.com>
>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> See
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/ARROW/Release+Management+Guide
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> The source release step is one of the places where problems
>>>>> occur.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> On Sat, Feb 9, 2019, 10:33 AM <ane...@quiltdata.io wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Feb 8, 2019, at 9:19 AM, Uwe L. Korn <m...@uwekorn.com>
>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> We could dockerize some of the release steps to ensure that
>>>>> they
>>>>>>>>> run in the same environment.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> I may be able to help with said Dockerization. If not for this
>>>>>>>>> release, then for the next. Are there docs on which systems we
>>>>> wish to
>>>>>>>>> target and/or any build steps beyond the current dev container (
>>>>>>>>> https://github.com/apache/arrow/tree/master/dev/container)?
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>

Reply via email to