I personally prefer 0.14.1 over 0.15.0. I think that is clearer in communication, as we are fixing regressions of the 0.14.0 release.
(but I haven't been involved much in releases, so certainly no strong opinion) Joris Op wo 10 jul. 2019 om 15:07 schreef Wes McKinney <wesmck...@gmail.com>: > hi folks, > > Are there any opinions / strong feelings about the two options: > > * Prepare patch 0.14.1 release from a maintenance branch > * Release 0.15.0 out of master > > Aside from the Parquet forward compatibility issues we're still > discussing, and Eric's C# patch PR 4836, are there any other issues > that need to be fixed before we go down one of these paths? > > Would anyone like to help with release management? I can do so if > necessary, but I've already done a lot of release management :) > > - Wes > > On Tue, Jul 9, 2019 at 4:13 PM Wes McKinney <wesmck...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > Hi Eric -- of course! > > > > On Tue, Jul 9, 2019, 4:03 PM Eric Erhardt > > <eric.erha...@microsoft.com.invalid> > wrote: > >> > >> Can we propose getting changes other than Python or Parquet related > into this release? > >> > >> For example, I found a critical issue in the C# implementation that, if > possible, I'd like to get included in a patch release. > https://github.com/apache/arrow/pull/4836 > >> > >> Eric > >> > >> -----Original Message----- > >> From: Wes McKinney <wesmck...@gmail.com> > >> Sent: Tuesday, July 9, 2019 7:59 AM > >> To: dev@arrow.apache.org > >> Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Need for 0.14.1 release due to Python package > problems, Parquet forward compatibility problems > >> > >> On Tue, Jul 9, 2019 at 12:02 AM Sutou Kouhei <k...@clear-code.com> > wrote: > >> > > >> > Hi, > >> > > >> > > If the problems can be resolved quickly, I should think we could cut > >> > > an RC for 0.14.1 by the end of this week. The RC could either be cut > >> > > from a maintenance branch or out of master -- any thoughts about > >> > > this (cutting from master is definitely easier)? > >> > > >> > How about just releasing 0.15.0 from master? > >> > It'll be simpler than creating a patch release. > >> > > >> > >> I'd be fine with that, too. > >> > >> > > >> > Thanks, > >> > -- > >> > kou > >> > > >> > In <CAJPUwMBPaz7zLBkBcVo-r= > nmvwuy8wxxddcctobuuamy4ee...@mail.gmail.com> > >> > "[DISCUSS] Need for 0.14.1 release due to Python package problems, > Parquet forward compatibility problems" on Mon, 8 Jul 2019 11:32:07 -0500, > >> > Wes McKinney <wesmck...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> > > >> > > hi folks, > >> > > > >> > > Perhaps unsurprisingly due to the expansion of our Python packages, > >> > > a number of things are broken in 0.14.0 that we should fix sooner > >> > > than the next major release. I'll try to send a complete list to > >> > > this thread to give a status within a day or two. Other problems may > >> > > arise in the next 48 hours as more people install the package. > >> > > > >> > > If the problems can be resolved quickly, I should think we could cut > >> > > an RC for 0.14.1 by the end of this week. The RC could either be cut > >> > > from a maintenance branch or out of master -- any thoughts about > >> > > this (cutting from master is definitely easier)? > >> > > > >> > > Would someone (who is not Kou) be able to assist with creating the > RC? > >> > > > >> > > Thanks, > >> > > Wes >
