Hi, https://github.com/apache/arrow/pull/5534 introduced ConcatenateTablesWithPromotion(). And there is already a ConcatenateTables() function which behaves differently (it requires the tables to have the schema). Wes raised a concern in that PR [1] that we might end up having many ConcatenateTables*() variants as there are various things that can be tweaked and he suggested to introduce a ConcatenateOptions so there is only one ConcatenateTables() function.
While I'm onboard with that idea, I wanted to double check that there is a consensus that we should (as of today) merge ConcatenateTables() and ConcatenateTablesWithPromotion(), and have an option to do promotion or not (as in an earlier comment in the PR, @bkietz advised otherwise, but maybe at that point we didn't realize there were potentially many variants). [1] https://github.com/apache/arrow/pull/5534#discussion_r343745573 Thanks, Zhuo
