Based on the Plasma-fork discussion thread, I think maybe we should wait until after the 2.0 release and if no one comes forward to support it, we can stop shipping it. We should probably send an e-mail at to user@ also to raise awareness.
On Mon, Sep 7, 2020 at 12:09 PM Antoine Pitrou <[email protected]> wrote: > > I would certainly be ok with removing Plasma. Factually, it's > unmaintained. > > Regards > > Antoine. > > > Le 07/09/2020 à 21:06, Uwe L. Korn a écrit : > > If we do that, we should be clear with that and remove the code. > Shipping Plasma as part of the release and not maintaining it as other > parts of the Arrow libraries seems inconsistent and will just be an > annoyance to user to find a partly unusable component. > > > > Cheers > > Uwe > > > > On Mon, Sep 7, 2020, at 7:58 PM, Robert Nishihara wrote: > >> I think that makes sense. They can be reopened if necessary. > >> > >> On Mon, Sep 7, 2020 at 9:49 AM Antoine Pitrou <[email protected]> > wrote: > >> > >>> > >>> Hello, > >>> > >>> The Plasma component in our C++ codebase is now unmaintained, with the > >>> original authors and maintainers having forked the codebase on their > >>> side. I propose to close the open Plasma issues in JIRA as "Won't > fix". > >>> Is there any concern about this? > >>> > >>> Regards > >>> > >>> Antoine. > >>> > >> >
