In the context of https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ARROW-9318 /
https://github.com/apache/arrow/pull/8023 which port the parquet-mr
design to c++: there's some question whether that design is consistent
with the style and conventions of the c++ implementation of parquet.

Here is a Gist with a sketched alternative design adapted to c++
https://gist.github.com/bkietz/f701d32add6f5a2aeed89ce36a443d43

Specific concerns in brief:
- Multiple internal classes are left public in header files, where it would
be
  preferred that public classes be kept to a minimum.
- Several levels of explicit synchronization with mutexes are used to
guarantee
  that each class is completely thread safe, but this is unnecessary
overhead
  given the pattern of use of `parquet-cpp`.

Reply via email to