Hi,

While refactoring my ORC writer so that Antoine and Uwe’s suggestions are 
implemented I found this weird Travis CI error caused by Plasma. Since Plasma 
is no longer maintained do we really need to have it in our Travis CI test? 
Thanks!

Ying
P.S. The job log is here: 
https://travis-ci.com/github/apache/arrow/jobs/474756034
The error message is contained below:

[33/267] Building CXX object 
src/plasma/CMakeFiles/plasma_objlib.dir/Unity/unity_0_cxx.cxx.o
2021 <>FAILED: src/plasma/CMakeFiles/plasma_objlib.dir/Unity/unity_0_cxx.cxx.o 
2022 <>/usr/bin/ccache /usr/bin/c++  -DARROW_EXPORTING -DARROW_HAVE_NEON 
-DARROW_JEMALLOC -DARROW_JEMALLOC_INCLUDE_DIR="" -DARROW_MIMALLOC 
-DARROW_NO_DEPRECATED_API -DARROW_WITH_RE2 -DARROW_WITH_TIMING_TESTS 
-DARROW_WITH_UTF8PROC -DGTEST_LINKED_AS_SHARED_LIBRARY=1 -Isrc -I/arrow/cpp/src 
-I/arrow/cpp/src/generated -isystem /arrow/cpp/thirdparty/flatbuffers/include 
-isystem jemalloc_ep-prefix/src -isystem 
mimalloc_ep/src/mimalloc_ep/lib/mimalloc-1.6/include -isystem 
googletest_ep-prefix/include -isystem /arrow/cpp/thirdparty/hadoop/include 
-Wno-noexcept-type -Wno-subobject-linkage  -fdiagnostics-color=always -ggdb -O0 
 -Wall -Wno-conversion -Wno-deprecated-declarations -Wno-sign-conversion 
-Wno-unused-variable -Werror -fno-semantic-interposition -march=armv8-a  -fPIC 
-g -fPIC   -std=c++11 -MD -MT 
src/plasma/CMakeFiles/plasma_objlib.dir/Unity/unity_0_cxx.cxx.o -MF 
src/plasma/CMakeFiles/plasma_objlib.dir/Unity/unity_0_cxx.cxx.o.d -o 
src/plasma/CMakeFiles/plasma_objlib.dir/Unity/unity_0_cxx.cxx.o -c 
src/plasma/CMakeFiles/plasma_objlib.dir/Unity/unity_0_cxx.cxx
2023 <>c++: fatal error: Killed signal terminated program cc1plus
2024 <>compilation terminated.
2025 <>
2026 <>
2027 <>No output has been received in the last 10m0s, this potentially 
indicates a stalled build or something wrong with the build itself.
2028 <>Check the details on how to adjust your build configuration on: 
https://docs.travis-ci.com/user/common-build-problems/#build-times-out-because-no-output-was-received

Reply via email to