Looks like we aren't quite ready to release. Nightly build failures seem to have increased rather than decreased, and we're still at 66 open issues on https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/ARROW/Arrow+4.0.0+Release despite our work this week (and despite my attempts to bump issues out of scope).
I strongly encourage you to (1) review your personal backlogs and those of the languages you maintain and move nonessential features out of the 4.0 scope and (2) if you are able, please help triage and fix the nightly builds. Thanks, Neal On Fri, Apr 9, 2021 at 12:33 AM Sutou Kouhei <k...@clear-code.com> wrote: > Hi, > > One more concern: > > * ASF's Bintray -> Artifactory migration isn't finished yet. > > https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/r9200fed3fa812f8c7de07a2500425f258db3231baa8e05f288175e4a%40%3Cbuilds.apache.org%3E > > I think that this is not a blocker. We'll not release > deb/rpm packages when we release 4.0. We can release > deb/rpm packages later. > > > Thanks, > -- > kou > > > In <caocv4hgknvmd7xvusx2mkisggwh+vtevqxtcyefkg38nki4...@mail.gmail.com> > "4.0 release preparation" on Mon, 5 Apr 2021 19:39:30 -0700, > Neal Richardson <neal.p.richard...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > Hi all, > > It's release time again. By our quarterly release pace, we are scheduled > > for an April 4.0.0 release. Given the time it takes to prepare and > approve > > a release, I think we should aim to close out our release scope by the > end > > of this week, beginning of next at latest, so that we can ensure a > release > > around the middle of the month. > > > > I have a few concerns, but hopefully they can be resolved in the next few > > days: > > > > * I count 11 nightly build failures on today's run, some of which I swear > > have been failing every day since the 3.0 release. That's not good. > > * https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/ARROW/Arrow+4.0.0+Release > > shows 6 blocking issues, some specifically around packaging and release > > tooling > > * The wiki page also shows 157 open, unstarted issues tagged for 4.0, > which > > seems overly ambitious. > > > > Any other concerns? Volunteers to help with some of those specific > issues? > > > > Thanks, > > Neal >
