Thanks David! I also responded/added more suggestions/questions to the doc. I think it makes sense to have two sections: one purely protocol oriented and second API oriented(examples in c++ or in any other language should make the idea easier to digest).
Thanks for the reference too! Cheers, Gosh On Mon, Jun 21, 2021 at 4:41 PM David Li <lidav...@apache.org> wrote: > Thanks! I've left some initial comments/suggestions to expand it in terms > of the format definitions and not the C++ APIs. > > I'll also note something like this was proposed a long time ago - there's > not very much discussion about it there but for reference: > https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/0e5ba78c48cdd0e357f3a4a6d8affd31767c34376b62c001910823af%40%3Cdev.arrow.apache.org%3E > (or see the thread '[Discuss][FlightRPC] Extensions to Flight: > "DoBidirectional"' from 2019-2020). It might be good to address why the > proposed workaround there (union-of-structs) is insufficient for the use > cases here (and in FlightSQL). > > -David > > On Mon, Jun 21, 2021, at 08:22, Gosh Arzumanyan wrote: > > Ah sorry, comments should work now. > > > > Cheers, > > Gosh > > > > On Mon., 21 Jun. 2021, 14:18 David Li, <lidav...@apache.org <mailto: > lidavidm%40apache.org>> wrote: > > > > > Thanks! Will give it a look. > > > > > > Would you mind opening it up for comments? > > > > > > -David > > > > > > On 2021/06/21 11:56:24, Gosh Arzumanyan <gosh...@gmail.com <mailto: > gosharz%40gmail.com>> wrote: > > > > Hi folks, > > > > > > > > Started putting some thoughts together here: > > > > > > > > https://docs.google.com/document/d/1dIOpKNYwsd9sdChsRBAx37BiJXl_7enpwWkH76n1tOI/edit?usp=sharing > > > > Any feedback is welcome! > > > > > > > > Cheers, > > > > Gosh > > > > > > > > > >
