I was able to reproduce it just now, with the same error. If there's a patch I can apply or a flag I can set, I'm happy to give it a run in the AM.
On Wed, Apr 12, 2023, at 10:02, Jacob Quinn wrote: > Hmmm, I'm also on MacOS m1, but didn't have any issues running tests. > > David, is the error reproducible? We fixed an issue for this in [this > commit]( > https://github.com/apache/arrow-julia/commit/6d0ac4946f062414e2b60aa3d67c2875bb2e7958), > but it's possible that our check for this condition wasn't strong > enough or > something. If it's reproducible, I'd appreciate being able to do a debug > build for you and have it report some data around our check for this. > > -Jacob > > On Tue, Apr 11, 2023 at 6:36 PM David Li <lidav...@apache.org> wrote: > >> I had an issue during verification (macOS/AArch64) [1] >> >> The gist seems to be: >> >> ``` >> nested task error: ArgumentError: unsafe_wrap: pointer 0x293389438 >> is not properly aligned to 16 bytes >> Stacktrace: >> [1] #unsafe_wrap#100 >> @ ./pointer.jl:92 [inlined] >> [2] unsafe_wrap >> @ ./pointer.jl:90 [inlined] >> [3] reinterp(#unused#::Type{Arrow.Decimal{2, 2, Int128}}, >> batch::Arrow.Batch, buf::Arrow.Flatbuf.Buffer, >> compression::Arrow.Flatbuf.BodyCompression) >> @ Arrow >> ~/Code/arrow-julia/verification/apache-arrow-julia-2.5.1/src/table.jl:557 >> [4] build(f::Arrow.Flatbuf.Field, #unused#::Arrow.Flatbuf.Decimal, >> batch::Arrow.Batch, rb::Arrow.Flatbuf.RecordBatch, de::Dict{Int64, >> Arrow.DictEncoding}, nodeidx::Int64, bufferidx::Int64, convert::Bool) >> @ Arrow >> ~/Code/arrow-julia/verification/apache-arrow-julia-2.5.1/src/table.jl:685 >> [5] build(field::Arrow.Flatbuf.Field, batch::Arrow.Batch, >> rb::Arrow.Flatbuf.RecordBatch, de::Dict{Int64, Arrow.DictEncoding}, >> nodeidx::Int64, bufferidx::Int64, convert::Bool) >> @ Arrow >> ~/Code/arrow-julia/verification/apache-arrow-julia-2.5.1/src/table.jl:498 >> [6] iterate(x::Arrow.VectorIterator, ::Tuple{Int64, Int64, Int64}) >> @ Arrow >> ~/Code/arrow-julia/verification/apache-arrow-julia-2.5.1/src/table.jl:474 >> [7] iterate >> @ >> ~/Code/arrow-julia/verification/apache-arrow-julia-2.5.1/src/table.jl:471 >> [inlined] >> [8] copyto!(dest::Vector{Any}, src::Arrow.VectorIterator) >> @ Base ./abstractarray.jl:946 >> [9] _collect >> @ ./array.jl:713 [inlined] >> [10] collect >> @ ./array.jl:707 [inlined] >> [11] macro expansion >> @ >> ~/Code/arrow-julia/verification/apache-arrow-julia-2.5.1/src/table.jl:376 >> [inlined] >> [12] (::Arrow.var"#108#114"{Bool, Channel{Any}, >> WorkerUtilities.OrderedSynchronizer, Dict{Int64, Arrow.DictEncoding}, >> Arrow.Batch, Int64})() >> @ Arrow ./threadingconstructs.jl:341 >> ``` >> >> I haven't gotten a chance to look more into it/try again. >> >> [1]: https://gist.github.com/lidavidm/b8f604b60c0a2cdfb04e96d4e58bdfdb >> >> On Wed, Apr 12, 2023, at 06:50, Sutou Kouhei wrote: >> > Hi, >> > >> > I would like to propose the following release candidate (RC1) of >> > Apache Arrow Julia version 2.5.1. >> > >> > This release candidate is based on commit: >> > 22088f1cb59bcd99fbffbf9d8248e491690dbfd9 [1] >> > >> > The source release rc1 is hosted at [2]. >> > >> > Please download, verify checksums and signatures, run the unit tests, >> > and vote on the release. See [3] for how to validate a release candidate. >> > >> > The vote will be open for at least 24 hours. >> > >> > [ ] +1 Release this as Apache Arrow Julia 2.5.1 >> > [ ] +0 >> > [ ] -1 Do not release this as Apache Arrow Julia 2.5.1 because... >> > >> > [1]: >> > >> https://github.com/apache/arrow-julia/tree/22088f1cb59bcd99fbffbf9d8248e491690dbfd9 >> > [2]: >> > >> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/arrow/apache-arrow-julia-2.5.1-rc1/ >> > [3]: >> > >> https://github.com/apache/arrow-julia/blob/main/dev/release/README.md#verify >>
