+1 These additions look excellent.
On Mon, Aug 14, 2023 at 10:40 AM David Li <lidav...@apache.org> wrote: > Hello, > > We have been discussing revisions [1] to the ADBC APIs, which we formerly > decided to treat as a specification [2]. These revisions clean up various > missing features (e.g. cancellation, error metadata) and better position > ADBC to help different data systems interoperate (e.g. by exposing more > metadata, like table/column statistics). > > For details, see the PR at [3]. (The main file to read through is adbc.h.) > > I would like to propose that the Arrow project adopt this RFC, along with > the linked PR, as version 1.1.0 of the ADBC API standard. > > Please vote to adopt the specification as described above. This is not a > vote to release any packages; the first package release to support version > 1.1.0 of the APIs will be 0.7.0 of the packages. (So I will not merge the > linked PR until after we release ADBC 0.6.0.) > > This vote will be open for at least 72 hours. > > [ ] +1 Adopt the ADBC 1.1.0 specification > [ ] 0 > [ ] -1 Do not adopt the specification because... > > Thanks to Sutou Kouhei, Matt Topol, Dewey Dunnington, Antoine Pitrou, Will > Ayd, and Will Jones for feedback on the design and various work-in-progress > PRs. > > [1]: https://github.com/apache/arrow-adbc/milestone/3 > [2]: https://lists.apache.org/thread/s8m4l9hccfh5kqvvd2x3gxn3ry0w1ryo > [3]: https://github.com/apache/arrow-adbc/pull/971 > > Thank you, > David >
