Thanks both for the explanation! Sounds good to me. Raúl
El sáb, 10 feb 2024, 22:46, Jacob Wujciak-Jens <ja...@voltrondata.com.invalid> escribió: > Thanks Nic. > > For a versioned history I planned to also have the versioned > 'apache-arrow-x.y.z-cran' tags or maybe 'apache-arrow-x.y.z-r' would be > less ambiguous as Nic mentioned. > The r-universe tag is unversioned so we can update it without any changes > on the r-universe side. > > On Sat, Feb 10, 2024 at 10:16 PM Raúl Cumplido <raulcumpl...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > Thanks for doing this! Only one question, would there be any downside on > > the R side on having the tag with a version associated so we have a > > historic on the repo? > > > > Something on the lines of "r-universe-release-15.0.0". > > > > Maybe not relevant at the moment but if in the future we decide to have > > some long term support releases or something like this it might be > > relevant. > > > > Thanks, > > Raúl > > > > > > El sáb, 10 feb 2024, 22:10, Jonathan Keane <jke...@gmail.com> escribió: > > > > > Thanks for this Nic. > > > > > > And just to clarify: the latest here is the latest _release_ of Apache > > > Arrow with this new set up. Prior to this the build available on > > R-universe > > > were effectively dev builds (commits to main), but with this new tag, > > > R-universe will only have (or at least default to having) the latest > > > release. > > > > > > -Jon > > > > > > > > > On Sat, Feb 10, 2024 at 2:18 PM Nic Crane <thisis...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > > Hi folks, > > > > > > > > The Arrow R package is distributed via a few different methods, one > of > > > > which is R-universe[1]. > > > > > > > > In order for r-universe to track the latest version of the R package, > > we > > > > have started using the tag "r-universe-release" to indicate the > commit > > > > which represents the latest version of the R package (which is also > > > > submitted to CRAN). > > > > > > > > I'm mentioning it here just to be transparent about this - it doesn't > > > make > > > > any changes to the current release process as it's still the version > > > based > > > > off the release candidate and this is just an additional step for > the R > > > > package which follows a successful main project release. > > > > > > > > Hope this all sounds OK - if not, happy to take feedback for changes > > etc > > > on > > > > this. > > > > > > > > Thanks, > > > > > > > > Nic > > > > > > > > > > > > [1] https://r-universe.dev/ > > > > > > > > > >
