+1 (binding)

I'm gonna give the Go impl another review and once over, but in general it
looks good and the Idea is sound.

On Thu, Mar 21, 2024, 10:12 AM Andrew Lamb <al...@influxdata.com> wrote:

> +1 (binding)
>
> I reviewed the spec proposal and the rust implementation and I think they
> look good to go. I am not as confident on the golang implementation, but
> the comments on the Go PR look like there are no objections.
>
> Thank you for your work driving this forward
>
> Andrew
>
> On Wed, Mar 20, 2024 at 10:04 PM Adam C <adam.curtis....@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > Hello,
> >
> > I would like to propose a change to the FlightSQL specification as
> > originally described in this Github issue [1] by Andrew Lamb. The
> > specification change would allow servers to support prepared
> > statements with parameters, without needing to manage state between
> > client requests.
> >
> > There is a draft pull request [2] submitted by me that updates the
> > protobuf format and documents the changes made in the FlightSQL
> > specification. I have also created draft reference implementations for
> > the Go [3] and Rust [4] FlightSQL libraries. These implementations
> > will be submitted as pull requests once the proposal is officially
> > adopted.
> >
> > The vote will be open for at least 72 hours.
> >
> > [ ] +1 Release this as Apache Arrow Rust
> > [ ] +0
> > [ ] -1 Do not release this as Apache Arrow Rust  because...
> >
> > Cheers,
> > Adam Curtis
> >
> > [1]:
> > https://github.com/apache/arrow/issues/37720
> > [2]:
> > https://github.com/apache/arrow/pull/40243
> > [3]:
> > https://github.com/apache/arrow/pull/40311
> > [4]:
> > https://github.com/apache/arrow-rs/pull/5433
> >
>

Reply via email to