Hey JB, The next step for me is going to be converting the document into a markdown version with more prose that we can add to the Arrow documentation site (marked as Experimental of course).
> (if I can help in any way :) ) I'll definitely add you as a reviewer when I put the PR up :). But i guess the best way you could help would be to get anyone you know who might be interested in this protocol or using the protocol to give it a try, have a look at the example code, and provide any and all feedback they can. The biggest thing that this protocol needs is real world usage that we can utilize to improve and update this protocol based on use-cases. --Matt On Tue, Apr 9, 2024 at 8:39 AM Jean-Baptiste Onofré <j...@nanthrax.net> wrote: > Hi Matt, > > Sorry, I'm late on this vote and in the doc review. > > I like the idea. Thanks for the very detailed document. > > Just curious, what's the next step (if I can help in any way :) ) ? > > Regards > JB > > On Tue, Feb 27, 2024 at 6:35 PM Matt Topol <zotthewiz...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > Hey all, > > > > I'd like to propose a vote for us to officially adopt the protocol > > described in the google doc[1] for Dissociated Arrow IPC Transports. This > > proposal was originally discussed at [2]. Once this proposal is adopted, > I > > will work on adding the necessary documentation to the Arrow website > along > > with examples etc. > > > > The vote will be open for at least 72 hours. > > > > [ ] +1 Accept this Proposal > > [ ] +0 > > [ ] -1 Do not accept this proposal because... > > > > Thank you everyone! > > > > --Matt > > > > [1]: > > > https://docs.google.com/document/d/1zHbnyK1r6KHpMOtEdIg1EZKNzHx-MVgUMOzB87GuXyk/edit#heading=h.38515dnp2bdb > > [2]: https://lists.apache.org/thread/tn5wt4p52f6kqjtx3tjxqd9122n4pf94 >
