Hi,

I've added some notes about JS/Swift/C#/Skype extractions.


Thanks,
-- 
kou

In <CAOCv4hj=388St-zNYBeWAf1xEZzCPv0Jo8+80=ht-yxllop...@mail.gmail.com>
  "Re: Arrow board update due soon" on Mon, 7 Jul 2025 08:28:10 -0400,
  Neal Richardson <neal.p.richard...@gmail.com> wrote:

> Thanks Nic, that's helpful, I can grab some things from that and include
> them.
> 
> Anyone else have comments or updates they'd like to add to the document? I
> did get the reminder email the day after I sent this out, and the report is
> due this Wednesday, July 9. So please get any changes you'd like included
> in by tomorrow, July 8.
> 
> Thanks,
> Neal
> 
> On Wed, Jul 2, 2025 at 12:57 PM Nic Crane <thisis...@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
>> In the dev meeting today, folks suggested grabbing the code that's being
>> used in the dashboard and looking at creating an LLM summary of the dev
>> mailing list to use as a starting point.  I extracted threads from May to
>> now, and added in a previous report as a rough reference for tone/structure
>> etc.  I won't paste any of this into the document as I'm unsure how useful
>> it is - if other folks could give some input here, that would be helpful.
>>
>> # Project Activity:
>>
>> Selected subproject updates:
>> ## Community & Ecosystem
>>
>> The community is discussing a proposal to canonicalize the variant
>> extension type across Arrow implementations. This would improve
>> cross-language interoperability for mixed-type columns (e.g., from
>> Parquet). Contributors are weighing whether Arrow should define and
>> maintain a standard set of extension types going forward.
>>
>> We’ve also seen strong uptake of the Kapa.ai documentation assistant (~850
>> queries/month), which is helping users discover relevant docs and resolve
>> common questions without needing to open issues or join mailing lists.
>>
>> There is renewed interest in community health tooling—such as dashboards
>> tracking stale issues and unmaintained components—driven by a desire to
>> improve contributor visibility and sustainability.
>> ## GPU Support
>>
>> A new arrow-gpu backend has been proposed for donation. Built on the wgpu
>> abstraction layer, it aims to provide vendor-neutral GPU acceleration
>> across compute kernels. The community is evaluating how this could
>> integrate into Arrow’s compute model without introducing unnecessary
>> complexity.
>> ## Feather Format
>>
>> Feather V1 support has been deprecated in the C++ implementation, in line
>> with the project's goal of simplifying its scope. Contributors agreed to
>> remove both write and read support, though there is some discussion around
>> retaining read-only fallback for legacy data.
>> ## Intervals and Standards Alignment
>>
>> The Iceberg community has proposed a new 128-bit ANSI SQL-compatible
>> interval type. Arrow contributors are considering whether this should be
>> adopted natively or handled as an extension type. This work is part of
>> broader efforts to ensure Arrow remains compatible with evolving lakehouse
>> and SQL engine standards.
>> ## Skyhook
>>
>> Skyhook has been removed from the Arrow monorepo and moved to its own
>> repository. This aligns with our strategy of offloading niche components to
>> simplify the core project and reduce maintenance burden.
>> ## CI & Infrastructure
>>
>> Thanks to newly granted AWS credits, we are expanding our CI and
>> benchmarking infrastructure. This includes adding GPU runners, improving
>> performance tracking, and supporting larger-memory workloads. These
>> improvements are expected to improve release robustness and enable
>> performance monitoring across languages.
>> ## Benchmarks
>>
>> Several contributors are working to make benchmarking more visible and
>> comparable across C++, Python, and R. This includes discussions around
>> standardized benchmark suites and dashboards to detect regressions
>> earlier—motivated in part by recent performance issues observed in Arrow R
>> 19.x and 20.x.
>>
>> On Wed, 2 Jul 2025 at 16:50, Neal Richardson <neal.p.richard...@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>> > Hi all,
>> > It's time for our quarterly ASF board update again. I haven't gotten the
>> > reminder email yet but know it is coming (whenever the July meeting is),
>> > and to give everyone enough time to provide input on the document, I
>> wanted
>> > to get started. Please have a look at [1] and add any updates you'd like
>> to
>> > include. I've filled in the basic facts to get us started.
>> >
>> > Thanks,
>> > Neal
>> >
>> > [1]:
>> >
>> >
>> https://docs.google.com/document/d/1fSYEmfGtmzjt1prHkdRoyxwGMmcX3onAStWArfiSBis/edit?tab=t.0
>> >
>>

Reply via email to