+1, I think it generally looks good but had a few nits/clarifications on the PR (the biggest one is taking a new reserved part of the namespace for canonical types).
On Tue, Sep 2, 2025 at 3:16 PM Ian Cook <[email protected]> wrote: > +1 (binding) > > Thank you Matt for taking on this project. > > Ian > > On Mon, Sep 1, 2025 at 2:58 PM Matt Topol <[email protected]> wrote: > > > Hello, > > > > I'd like to propose a canonical extension type for Parquet's 'Variant' > > type. Prior discussions can be found at [1], along with the proposal at > > [2]. The Go implementation can be found at [3] while work is happening on > > the Rust implementation at [4] and C++ at [5]. > > > > The vote will be open for at least 72 hours. > > > > [ ] +1 Accept this proposal > > [ ] +0 > > [ ] -1 Do not accept this proposal because... > > > > [1]: https://github.com/apache/arrow/issues/46908 > > [2]: https://github.com/apache/arrow/pull/47456 > > [3]: > > https://github.com/apache/arrow-go/blob/main/arrow/extensions/variant.go > > [4]: https://github.com/apache/arrow-rs/issues/6736 > > [5]: https://github.com/apache/arrow/issues/45937 > > >
