Just +1 from me. More generally, we should do a pass on our documentation and docstrings to find other things marked experimental that are due for an official status.
Le 1 octobre 2025 11:38:27 GMT+02:00, "Raúl Cumplido" <[email protected]> a écrit : >Hi, > >I wanted to discuss removing the Experimental warning on the PyCapsule >protocol documentation [1]. Now reads: >Warning: >The Arrow PyCapsule Interface should be considered experimental > >There haven't been major updates to the PyCapsule Interface during the last >2 years, since it was created and has seen widespread usage as tracked on >this comment [2]. The only big change was adding C Device. > >What do people think about removing experimental and moving the PyCapsule >protocol to stable? > >This conversation started at EuroPython where some of the maintainers were >asked how stable was the PyCapsule protocol. There was a conversation on >Zulip some time ago and the feedback was positive to move the conversation >forward. > >I am happy to follow up with a vote and a PR to update the documentation if >there's no opposition. > >Regards, >Raúl > >[1] >https://arrow.apache.org/docs/format/CDataInterface/PyCapsuleInterface.html >[2] https://github.com/apache/arrow/issues/39195#issuecomment-2245718008
