Thanks, Sutou - we will give this a try.

Regards,
Marco.


On Tue, Nov 25, 2025 at 3:52 PM Sutou Kouhei <[email protected]> wrote:

> Hi,
>
> >
> https://github.com/sofia-tekdatum/arrow-22/actions/runs/19181753453/job/54839949581?pr=2
>
> https://github.com/apache/arrow/pull/48257 fixes this.
>
> Thanks,
> --
> kou
>
> In <camsr1vryhqtwxpbma8e+2dvp4rlbjqnermvyc0s2wbskst8...@mail.gmail.com>
>   "Failing Github Actions" on Tue, 25 Nov 2025 11:36:44 -0600,
>   Marco Arguedas <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > Hello,
> >
> > I am part of a team that is working on an Arrow fork, working on an
> > enhancement to the C++ implementation of Parquet Modular Encryption.
> >
> > We have been seeing a lot of failing github actions and want to
> understand
> > these better. We created a fresh fork off of the most recent Arrow
> release
> > (22.0, commit 5eabf), and then just added a comment to each file that we
> > touch on our project. No functionality was modified. The purpose of this
> is
> > to trigger all actions that our code changes will eventually trigger, but
> > from a stable version. However, even from the stable version, we have
> > noticed plenty of actions failing.
> >
> > This is a run of the actions:
> >
> https://github.com/sofia-tekdatum/arrow-22/actions/runs/19181753453/job/54839949581?pr=2
> > This is the PR (as you will see, we only added comments to a subset of
> > files) https://github.com/sofia-tekdatum/arrow-22/pull/1
> >
> > Most of the failing actions are Ruby-related, but there are a few other
> > types in there as well. If necessary, we can characterize/summarize the
> > failures in depth.
> >
> > Our main question here: is there a reason for a stable version with no
> > virtually no changes shows a relatively high number of Github action
> > failures (such as the ones above)?
> >
> > Regards,
> > Marco Arguedas
>

Reply via email to