Hi

Following my message to the other thread, let me reply here.

+1 (non binding) to add is_update field to
ActionCreatePreparedStatementResult.

I suggest extending this vote by one week to give others time to chime in.

Regards
JB

On 2026/04/08 22:39:42 Pedro Matias wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Following the discussion in the mailing list at [0], to allow Flight SQL
> servers to communicate the proper network flow for executing a prepared
> statement (CommandPreparedStatementQuery or
CommandPreparedStatementUpdate)
> to clients, I have proposed a new boolean field, is_update, be added to
the
> ActionCreatePreparedStatementResult message.
>
> This change is backward and forward compatible. Old clients ignore the
> field set by new servers (this derives directly from protobuf behavior).
> New clients can determine the path to use with their current behavior when
> running prepared statements on old servers (this needs to be handled in
> each implementation).
>
> The spec change PR is available at [1]
>
> I have draft PRs for implementing the change in Java (including the JDBC
> Flight SQL driver) at [2] and in Go at [3]. I also have a PR for the Go
> ADBC Flight SQL driver at [4]. Since the Python ADBC driver wraps the Go
> driver, it is also affected even though the code remained unchanged.
>
> If this is approved, I personally commit to implementing the change in C++
> and the new FlightSQL ODBC driver (once it is released).
>
> The vote will be open for at least 72 hours.
> [ ] +1 Accept addition of is_update field to
> ActionCreatePreparedStatementResult
> [ ] +0
> [ ] -1 Do not accept because...
>
> PS - I am not a PMC member, but during the community meeting today Bryce
> told me I could initiate the vote myself. I read previous spec changes
> threads to get a grasp on how the process usually goes, but I apologize in
> advance if I broke any protocol with this action. Let me know if that is
> the case so I can correct my behavior.
>
> [0] - https://lists.apache.org/thread/88msflnwkkw8t81czs2ndqhkn1fb1pxd
> [1] - https://github.com/apache/arrow/pull/49498
> [2] - https://github.com/apache/arrow-java/pull/1064
> [3] - https://github.com/apache/arrow-go/pull/732
> [4] - https://github.com/apache/arrow-adbc/pull/4161
>
> Pedro
>

Reply via email to