I guess there are other issues like the ones David brought up (emails to the list about comments there, etc). Hopefully they're addressable or misunderstandings of how we do things.
-Ian On Wed, Jul 15, 2015 at 9:52 AM, Chris Hillery <[email protected]> wrote: > I'm probably missing something, but - why do we need to "trade" anything to > use Gerrit? With our current working method, the result is that all commits > are both authored and pushed to ASF by the initial committer with no > changes. What rule or guideline do we run afoul of that would prevent us > from continuing to work this way? > > Ceej > aka Chris Hillery > On Jul 15, 2015 2:39 AM, "Jochen Wiedmann" <[email protected]> > wrote: > >> On Wed, Jul 15, 2015 at 11:36 AM, Ian Maxon <[email protected]> wrote: >> > so I don't >> > quite see where the value add would come from. We can do all kinds of >> >> There's no direct added value for the project. But I'd view this as a >> possible item to trade for when it comes to getting the incubators >> endorsal regarding the Gerrit instance. >> >> Jochen >> >> >> -- >> Any world that can produce the Taj Mahal, William Shakespeare, >> and Stripe toothpaste can't be all bad. (C.R. MacNamara, One Two Three) >>
