On Wed, Aug 5, 2015 at 9:19 PM, Sattam Alsubaiee <[email protected]> wrote:
> For spatial types, it looks like GeoJSON is a good reference. We can pretty > much use their style for all of our spatial types: I'm afraid I don't agree with this assessment, for the reasons I mentioned earlier. We could offer a library to convert to/from GeoJSON, but I do not think it (or, worse, "something like it") is a good choice for either the lossless or the clean JSON serializations. Ceej aka Chris Hillery
