+1 Sent from my iPhone
> On Aug 28, 2015, at 10:32 PM, Mike Carey <[email protected]> wrote: > > Sounds like we have a consensus on that, then: No feeds this release, > unblock the release, and full steam ahead w/o them!. > >> On 8/28/15 7:37 PM, Till Westmann wrote: >> I would agree. >> To me the main focus of this release is our ability to release and not >> necessarily features (even though it’s certainly nice if we have new working >> features ;). >> When this release is out, we could immediately work on getting the missing >> pieces in and do another release (ideally with another release manager to >> spread the knowledge about the process and to smoothen the process). >> >> My 2c, >> Till >> >>> On Aug 28, 2015, at 10:32 PM, Chen Li <[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>> Heri was trying to make this part work. Any update from him? >>> >>> In general, if we cannot make secondary feeds work and documented quickly, >>> I don't think it's a good idea to include it in this release. >>> >>> Chen >>> >>>> On Fri, Aug 28, 2015 at 8:03 PM, Ian Maxon <[email protected]> wrote: >>>> >>>> What's in master (in the docs) seems to work OK, but that's just >>>> connecting a source to a dataset directly. There's some issue with >>>> printing some tweets (e.g. for $x in dataset Tweets return $x) that >>>> contain special characters, but I'm not sure where that comes from. >>>> However I haven't had much luck getting the secondary feeds/functions >>>> to work. The original documentation seemed to refer to a function that >>>> was renamed/moved, but the renamed function (addHashTags) didn't work >>>> right for me either ( in https://asterix-gerrit.ics.uci.edu/#/c/359/). >>>> >>>> If there was a function (that will work reliably) we could use to >>>> create a secondary feed that's already in the code, I think that would >>>> let us include that feature in the docs. Without that though, I don't >>>> know what else can be done besides leaving it hidden for the immediate >>>> future. >>>> >>>> - Ian >>>> >>>> On Fri, Aug 28, 2015 at 4:56 PM, Michael Carey <[email protected]> >>>> wrote: >>>>> Q: So where are things on the feeds front - in terms of what's documented >>>>> and what works as advertised (and documented)? >
