IMHO, yes - "start-with" doesn't actually make much sense. At a quick glance, there are a number of test cases for start-with that are not replicated for starts-with, so those would need to be updated as well... likely the same for end-with.
Ceej aka Chris Hillery On Mon, Sep 28, 2015 at 5:22 PM, Jianfeng Jia <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi devs, > > While updating all the var-length design for string functions, I found > there are two functions named “start-with” and “starts-with” which are > implemented in the same way. The online document seems using “starts-with” > http://asterixdb.ics.uci.edu/documentation/aql/functions.html#StringFunctions > < > http://asterixdb.ics.uci.edu/documentation/aql/functions.html#StringFunctions > >. > > Should I just remove the “start-with” ? The same problem applies for > “end-with” VS “ends-with” as well. > > > Best, > > Jianfeng Jia > PhD Candidate of Computer Science > University of California, Irvine > >
