-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/63879/#review193913
-----------------------------------------------------------




repository/src/main/java/org/apache/atlas/repository/graph/GraphHelper.java
Line 205 (original), 208 (patched)
<https://reviews.apache.org/r/63879/#comment272573>

    The called method itself already traces this. The => is misleading as it is 
not an entry. I suggest removing this trace entry



repository/src/main/java/org/apache/atlas/repository/graph/GraphHelper.java
Lines 289 (patched)
<https://reviews.apache.org/r/63879/#comment272574>

    I suggest you trace args - as they could be very good for debugging



repository/src/main/java/org/apache/atlas/repository/graph/GraphHelper.java
Lines 524 (patched)
<https://reviews.apache.org/r/63879/#comment272575>

    How aboiut putting put the clazz name here?



repository/src/main/java/org/apache/atlas/repository/graph/GraphHelper.java
Line 521 (original), 570 (patched)
<https://reviews.apache.org/r/63879/#comment272576>

    A minor suggestion : maybe "from edge {}"



repository/src/main/java/org/apache/atlas/repository/graph/GraphHelper.java
Line 570 (original), 630 (patched)
<https://reviews.apache.org/r/63879/#comment272577>

    edge => edgeString



repository/src/main/java/org/apache/atlas/repository/graph/GraphHelper.java
Lines 641 (patched)
<https://reviews.apache.org/r/63879/#comment272578>

    should be use the vertexString method here?



repository/src/main/java/org/apache/atlas/repository/graph/GraphHelper.java
Line 591 (original), 653 (patched)
<https://reviews.apache.org/r/63879/#comment272579>

    and here



repository/src/main/java/org/apache/atlas/repository/graph/GraphHelper.java
Line 764 (original), 833 (patched)
<https://reviews.apache.org/r/63879/#comment272580>

    can we put the classType out here?



repository/src/main/java/org/apache/atlas/repository/store/graph/v1/AtlasEntityGraphDiscoveryV1.java
Line 364 (original), 361 (patched)
<https://reviews.apache.org/r/63879/#comment272584>

    I suggest using block comment rather than lots of line comments.



repository/src/main/java/org/apache/atlas/repository/store/graph/v1/AtlasEntityGraphDiscoveryV1.java
Lines 365 (patched)
<https://reviews.apache.org/r/63879/#comment272581>

    I hada go at reqeriting to remove the yous from the description. what do 
you think of:
    
    "This code needs to cater for imports, where entities can contain 
attributes that refer to entities that have not been processed yet by the 
import. In this situation a partial entity comes into this method; the partial 
entity is not pully formed becase it has a reference to an entity that the 
import has not seen yet. In this case getRelationshipAttributes() does not get 
the relationshipattributes; the code needs to use the more general 
getAttribute() instead.



repository/src/main/java/org/apache/atlas/repository/store/graph/v1/AttributeMutationContext.java
Lines 91 (patched)
<https://reviews.apache.org/r/63879/#comment272582>

    shouldnt we use vertexString() here?



repository/src/main/java/org/apache/atlas/repository/store/graph/v1/AttributeMutationContext.java
Lines 95 (patched)
<https://reviews.apache.org/r/63879/#comment272583>

    shouldnt we use edgeString() here?



repository/src/main/java/org/apache/atlas/repository/store/graph/v1/EntityGraphMapper.java
Lines 866 (patched)
<https://reviews.apache.org/r/63879/#comment272585>

    should we mention the AtlasRelatedObjectId processing here?



repository/src/main/java/org/apache/atlas/repository/store/graph/v1/EntityGraphMapper.java
Lines 1029 (patched)
<https://reviews.apache.org/r/63879/#comment272586>

    If we have a relationship guid - we trace it. I was expecting it to be 
involved with the matching of new and existing edges.


- David Radley


On Dec. 8, 2017, 12:53 p.m., Graham Wallis wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://reviews.apache.org/r/63879/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated Dec. 8, 2017, 12:53 p.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for atlas.
> 
> 
> Repository: atlas
> 
> 
> Description
> -------
> 
> ATLAS-2262.patch
> This patch contains fixes for the EntityGraphMapper and related classes, to 
> fix intermittent relationship failures.
> This change means that an UPDATE operation will inspect the existing and new 
> relationships and compare them fully before adding/modifying edges. Matching 
> elements will be reused, new elements will be added, and redundant elements 
> will be discarded. The behaviour should be consistent regardless of which 
> graph provider is being used.
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   repository/src/main/java/org/apache/atlas/repository/graph/GraphHelper.java 
> 3e602431400677cbe0d8fe440732b02bb4a30a62 
>   
> repository/src/main/java/org/apache/atlas/repository/store/graph/v1/AtlasEntityGraphDiscoveryV1.java
>  d6effbf77b7dbd3479bab3899730bdcbabdce351 
>   
> repository/src/main/java/org/apache/atlas/repository/store/graph/v1/AtlasEntityStoreV1.java
>  b0f9845d6e92a6ef4bb53cccec537a0a54afb5e8 
>   
> repository/src/main/java/org/apache/atlas/repository/store/graph/v1/AttributeMutationContext.java
>  b6d82dd834b8cc8b3bac630c084b91ac34dd0cec 
>   
> repository/src/main/java/org/apache/atlas/repository/store/graph/v1/EntityGraphMapper.java
>  f6a15b695e676bc035ce8336bcce7bacf1852ff9 
>   
> repository/src/test/java/org/apache/atlas/repository/impexp/ImportServiceTest.java
>  ab25faaa9caffe5bf2796194057f0556d4bfc431 
>   
> repository/src/test/java/org/apache/atlas/repository/store/graph/v1/AtlasEntityStoreV1Test.java
>  1f8b9fdbfd5d987288983f7be99ea0f36f7255d4 
>   
> repository/src/test/java/org/apache/atlas/repository/store/graph/v1/AtlasRelationshipStoreV1Test.java
>  b418fef90a0bcadba47679028c134b836bdd9079 
> 
> 
> Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/63879/diff/4/
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> Build with test enabled, using Janus graph provider
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Graham Wallis
> 
>

Reply via email to