-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/69133/#review209947
-----------------------------------------------------------




repository/src/main/java/org/apache/atlas/repository/store/graph/v1/AtlasEntityStoreV1.java
Lines 259 (patched)
<https://reviews.apache.org/r/69133/#comment294595>

    Same multi-responsibility concept is being applied here. 
    
    I feel it's better to break this down into checkState and fixState methods.



repository/src/main/java/org/apache/atlas/repository/store/graph/v1/AtlasEntityStoreV1.java
Lines 866 (patched)
<https://reviews.apache.org/r/69133/#comment294593>

    This method is performing two different actions. Ideally a method should 
only perform one action.
    
    Also when I look at checkState method signature, the initial impression I 
get is that this would perform a diagnostic kind of operation, but internally 
it does some corrections as well on the basis of the boolean flag. If possible, 
please make separate methods to address these actions.



repository/src/main/java/org/apache/atlas/repository/store/graph/v1/AtlasEntityStoreV1.java
Lines 872 (patched)
<https://reviews.apache.org/r/69133/#comment294594>

    Can't we get the EntityGraphRetriever object using injection at class level 
?
    
    Here for each guid a new object gets created.


- Apoorv Naik


On Oct. 24, 2018, 1:25 a.m., Madhan Neethiraj wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://reviews.apache.org/r/69133/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated Oct. 24, 2018, 1:25 a.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for atlas, Abhishek Kadam, Apoorv Naik, Ashutosh Mestry, keval 
> bhatt, Kapildeo Nayak, Nixon Rodrigues, and Sarath Subramanian.
> 
> 
> Bugs: ATLAS-2934
>     https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ATLAS-2934
> 
> 
> Repository: atlas
> 
> 
> Description
> -------
> 
> This patch adds a REST API to scan specified entities for inconsistency of 
> __traitNames property value and fix it. If the property value does not match 
> the classification vertices associated with the entity, the value will be 
> updated to reflect the associated vertices.
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   
> intg/src/main/java/org/apache/atlas/model/instance/AtlasCheckStateRequest.java
>  PRE-CREATION 
>   
> intg/src/main/java/org/apache/atlas/model/instance/AtlasCheckStateResult.java 
> PRE-CREATION 
>   
> repository/src/main/java/org/apache/atlas/repository/store/graph/AtlasEntityStore.java
>  6a1a88f4f 
>   
> repository/src/main/java/org/apache/atlas/repository/store/graph/v1/AtlasEntityStoreV1.java
>  449a9588e 
>   
> repository/src/main/java/org/apache/atlas/repository/store/graph/v1/EntityGraphRetriever.java
>  0445e2798 
>   webapp/src/main/java/org/apache/atlas/web/resources/AdminResource.java 
> b53ac69c4 
>   webapp/src/test/java/org/apache/atlas/web/resources/AdminResourceTest.java 
> 2f4b3d9bb 
> 
> 
> Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/69133/diff/1/
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> Verified that the new API detects and fixes __traitNames property, for the 
> inconsistencies introduced. Here is a sample response from the call:
> 
> {
>     "state":               "FIXED",
>     "entitiesScanned":       19021,
>     "entitiesFixed":             1,
>     "entitiesNotFixed":          0,
>     "entitiesOk":            19020,
>     "entitiesPartiallyFixed":    0,
>     "entities": {
>         "e87a1236-eeb4-4474-8cfd-a82117b8d1cd": {
>             "guid": "e87a1236-eeb4-4474-8cfd-a82117b8d1cd",
>             "name":     "testDb.testTable@myCluster",
>             "state":    "FIXED",
>             "status":   "ACTIVE",
>             "typeName": "hive_table",
>             "issues": [
>                 "incorrect property: __traitNames has missing 
> classifications: [DATA_QUALITY]",
>                 "incorrect property: __traitNames has unassigned 
> classifications: [UNKNOWN_TAG2, UNKNOWN_TAG]"
>             ]
>         }
>     }
> }
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Madhan Neethiraj
> 
>

Reply via email to