[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ATLAS-528?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15232662#comment-15232662
 ] 

ATLAS QA commented on ATLAS-528:
--------------------------------

{color:red}-1 overall{color}.  Here are the results of testing the latest 
attachment
  http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12797755/ATLAS_528.2.patch
  against master revision a908001.

    {color:green}+1 @author{color}.  The patch does not contain any @author 
tags.

    {color:green}+1 tests included{color}.  The patch appears to include 1 new 
or modified test files.

    {color:green}+1 javac{color}.  The applied patch does not increase the 
total number of javac compiler warnings.

    {color:green}+1 javadoc{color}.  There were no new javadoc warning messages.

    +1 checkstyle.  The patch generated 0 code style errors.

    {color:red}-1 findbugs{color}.  The patch appears to introduce 352 new 
Findbugs (version 2.0.3) warnings.

    {color:green}+1 release audit{color}.  The applied patch does not increase 
the total number of release audit warnings.

    {color:red}-1 core tests{color}.  The patch failed these unit tests in :
                   
org.apache.atlas.repository.audit.HBaseBasedAuditRepositoryTest
./repository/target/surefire-reports/junitreports/TEST-org.apache.atlas.repository.audit.HBaseBasedAuditRepositoryTest

Test results: 
https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-ATLAS-Build/142//testReport/
Findbugs warnings: 
https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-ATLAS-Build/142//artifact/patchprocess/newPatchFindbugsWarningsrepository.html
Findbugs warnings: 
https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-ATLAS-Build/142//artifact/patchprocess/newPatchFindbugsWarningstitan.html
Findbugs warnings: 
https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-ATLAS-Build/142//artifact/patchprocess/newPatchFindbugsWarningswebapp.html
Findbugs warnings: 
https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-ATLAS-Build/142//artifact/patchprocess/newPatchFindbugsWarningstypesystem.html
Findbugs warnings: 
https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-ATLAS-Build/142//artifact/patchprocess/newPatchFindbugsWarningsclient.html
Findbugs warnings: 
https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-ATLAS-Build/142//artifact/patchprocess/newPatchFindbugsWarningsnotification.html
Findbugs warnings: 
https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-ATLAS-Build/142//artifact/patchprocess/newPatchFindbugsWarningscommon.html
Findbugs warnings: 
https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-ATLAS-Build/142//artifact/patchprocess/newPatchFindbugsWarningshive-bridge.html
Findbugs warnings: 
https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-ATLAS-Build/142//artifact/patchprocess/newPatchFindbugsWarningshdfs-model.html
Findbugs warnings: 
https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-ATLAS-Build/142//artifact/patchprocess/newPatchFindbugsWarningsstorm-bridge.html
Findbugs warnings: 
https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-ATLAS-Build/142//artifact/patchprocess/newPatchFindbugsWarningssqoop-bridge.html
Console output: https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-ATLAS-Build/142//console

This message is automatically generated.

> support drop table, view
> ------------------------
>
>                 Key: ATLAS-528
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ATLAS-528
>             Project: Atlas
>          Issue Type: Sub-task
>    Affects Versions: 0.7-incubating
>            Reporter: Suma Shivaprasad
>            Assignee: Suma Shivaprasad
>             Fix For: 0.7-incubating
>
>         Attachments: ATLAS-528.1.patch, ATLAS-528.patch, ATLAS_528.2.patch
>
>
> Drop table and view requires soft deletes. The reason is whenever a table is 
> dropped , it also may have an associated lineage which consists of a 
> hive_process which N input tables and an output table. If the table is 
> dropped, the lineage edge is also dropped resulting in incorrect lineage 
> history. 
> With soft deletes, the expected behaviour is to changes the table status to 
> "deleted" and when the table is recreated through a create table statement, 
> then create another vertex/entity for that table with the new state. Also,  
> the lineage for this newly recreated table should be a new hive_process and 
> should not reuse the existing entity/vertex even though the hive statement 
> for that process is the same.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)

Reply via email to