Just to be clear, I'm proposing forking the java parts only. On Mon, Jul 6, 2015 at 9:06 AM, Joseph Smith <yasumo...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Also a (tough to concede) +1. Although I’m not a fan of the fork, it will > help improve velocity and empower a migration away from twitter common. > > > On Jul 3, 2015, at 8:15 PM, Bill Farner <wfar...@apache.org> wrote: > > > > That's roughly the eventual plan, which this move would help us > facilitate. > > We use guava heavily already, most of our current dependence is on ZK > and args handling code...but we would look towards dep-shallow alternatives. > > > > > > > > _____________________________ > > From: Chris Aniszczyk <caniszc...@gmail.com> > > Sent: Friday, July 3, 2015 8:03 AM > > Subject: Re: Forking twitter-commons into our tree > > To: <dev@aurora.apache.org> > > Cc: Jake Farrell <jfarr...@apache.org> > > > > > > I'll see what I can do about IP clearance. > > > > For giggles, how much work do you think it would be to shed > twitter-commons > > and just rely on guava and other what I would consider more standard > > libraries. > > > > On Thu, Jul 2, 2015 at 10:34 PM, Bill Farner <wfar...@apache.org> wrote: > > > >> Thanks, Jake! > >> > >> -=Bill > >> > >> On Thu, Jul 2, 2015 at 8:10 PM, Jake Farrell <jfarr...@apache.org> > wrote: > >> > >>> yes, makes it easier to donate when its Apache License 2.0, but still > >>> requires the IP clearance [1], which is handled through the IPMC. This > is > >>> required so there is an audit trail of that software being donated to > the > >>> ASF > >>> > >>> -Jake > >>> > >>> [1]: http://incubator.apache.org/ip-clearance/index.html > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> On Thu, Jul 2, 2015 at 10:41 PM, Bill Farner <wfar...@apache.org> > wrote: > >>> > >>>> Jake - i'm not fully versed on licenses, but is that true even though > >>> it's > >>>> all Apache License 2.0? > >>>> > >>>> -=Bill > >>>> > >>>> On Thu, Jul 2, 2015 at 5:28 PM, Jake Farrell <jfarr...@apache.org> > >>> wrote: > >>>> > >>>>> no objections, but we would have to get an IP clearance doc from > >>> Twitter > >>>>> for this code in order to bring this code into the ASF > >>>>> > >>>>> -Jake > >>>>> > >>>>> On Thu, Jul 2, 2015 at 3:20 PM, Zameer Manji <zma...@apache.org> > >>> wrote: > >>>>> > >>>>>> Hey, > >>>>>> > >>>>>> Aurora depends heavily on twitter-commons for lots of > >> functionality. > >>>>>> However upstream is not very active and I suspect that it will be > >>> less > >>>>>> active in the future. Currently we depend on artifacts published > >> from > >>>>> this > >>>>>> project which causes us to depend on older versions of guava and > >>> guice. > >>>>>> > >>>>>> As a result, it seems that will be difficult to address tickets > >> like > >>>>>> AURORA-1380 <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AURORA-1380> > >>>> without > >>>>>> changing something. I propose we fork all of the java portions of > >>>>>> twitter-commons into our tree, remove the parts we don't use and > >>> update > >>>>>> guava and guice so we can move forward on this front. > >>>>>> > >>>>>> What are people's thoughts on this? > >>>>>> > >>>>>> -- > >>>>>> Zameer Manji > >>>>>> > >>>>> > >>>> > >>> > >> > > > > > > > > -- > > Cheers, > > > > Chris Aniszczyk > > http://aniszczyk.org > > +1 512 961 6719 > > -- > Zameer Manji > > <%2B1%20512%20961%206719> >
