It looks like the tickets for 0.10.0 already existed and I have assigned them to myself: RC: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AURORA-1250 Deprecations: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AURORA-1367 Breaking Changes: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AURORA-1251
It looks like the tickets Bill referenced are already linked to the ticket so we are good to go. On Tue, Sep 15, 2015 at 6:35 PM, Jake Farrell <jfarr...@apache.org> wrote: > can agree with that, just dont want to see us forget about it and have > stale code sitting around. moved to the 0.10 deprecations epic > > -Jake > > On Tue, Sep 15, 2015 at 8:26 PM, Bill Farner <wfar...@apache.org> wrote: > > > TODO cleanup seems to be an ongoing process, and much like documentation > - > > i think it's tricky to put on a roadmap. > > > > On Tue, Sep 15, 2015 at 1:19 PM, Jake Farrell <jfarr...@apache.org> > wrote: > > > > > we should probably spend some time before .10 going through and > cleaning > > up > > > deprecation todo's left in the code also. I've added this to the Aurora > > > Roadmap Google doc > > > > > > -Jake > > > > > > On Thu, Sep 10, 2015 at 2:09 PM, Bill Farner <wfar...@apache.org> > wrote: > > > > > > > I agree, documentation overhauls are best decoupled from releases. > > > > > > > > On Thu, Sep 10, 2015 at 10:49 AM, Jake Farrell <jfarr...@apache.org> > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > Think that this is a great idea and agree that we need to spend > some > > > time > > > > > improving our user content, but it should not be a blocker to the > > next > > > > > release candidate. Improving our documentation and website should > be > > an > > > > > ongoing effort > > > > > > > > > > -Jake > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Thu, Sep 10, 2015 at 1:43 PM, Zameer Manji <zma...@apache.org> > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > One thing I would like to see in 0.10.0 is improvement to our > > > > > > documentation. We have a lot of documentation but I don't think > it > > is > > > > > well > > > > > > organized or very accessible to a new user or a prospective user. > > > This > > > > > > might involve writing new documentation, improving our, website, > > etc. > > > > > > > > > > > > On Tue, Sep 8, 2015 at 9:30 AM, Bill Farner <wfar...@apache.org> > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > In 0.10.0 i would like to see: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > - groundwork and initial endpoints in a REST API (part of > > > AURORA-987) > > > > > > > > > > > > > > - thermos executor support for a simple task description. this > > > would > > > > > be > > > > > > a > > > > > > > dramatically reduced json schema that the executor can consume > > for > > > > > simple > > > > > > > use cases where the user is invoking a single shell command > > > > > > > > > > > > > > - support for custom executors (AURORA-1376) > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Mon, Aug 31, 2015 at 11:18 AM, Zameer Manji < > > zma...@apache.org> > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > As discussed in today's IRC meeting I will be heading up the > > > 0.10.0 > > > > > > > > release. What would people like to see in this release? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > > > > > > Zameer Manji > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > > > > > Zameer Manji > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > Zameer Manji > >
