Filed https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AURORA-1497 to add
documentation on how best to upgrade the various Aurora components.

On Mon, Sep 21, 2015 at 12:58 PM, Joseph Smith <[email protected]> wrote:

> We also shut down all of the schedulers, upgrade to the new version, then
> bring them all back up. This isn’t a hard requirement, but it has made
> things a bit simpler for us in practice to always know we’re dealing with
> the same version of the schedulers on all hosts at once.
>
> > On Sep 21, 2015, at 10:55 AM, Zameer Manji <[email protected]> wrote:
> >
> > I don't think the 0.7 -> 0.9 upgrade path has been tested. I think it is
> > advisable to upgrade from 0.7 to 0.8 then later upgrade from 0.8 to 0.9.
> I
> > think Jeff's upgrade steps are reasonable and shouldn't give you any
> > trouble. Note that upgrading the executors won't affect existing tasks.
> If
> > you want the current tasks on the system to adopt the latest executor you
> > will need to upgrade the executor and then roll your tasks so they can be
> > relaunched with the updated binary. This isn't necessary to do but keep
> > this in mind if you are expecting tasks to leverage the latest executor
> > functionality.
> >
> > On Sun, Sep 20, 2015 at 8:30 PM, Jeff Schroeder <
> [email protected]>
> > wrote:
> >
> >> When I did this, I updated the executors, then the observers, and then
> the
> >> schedulers, one at a time, in a rolling fashion. Seemed to work fine,
> but
> >> the clusters were lightly utilized.
> >>
> >> On Sun, Sep 20, 2015 at 9:40 PM, Mauricio Garavaglia <
> >> [email protected]> wrote:
> >>
> >>> Hi guys,
> >>>
> >>> I'm about to upgrade a cluster from 0.7 to 0.9 and was wondering what
> are
> >>> the things to consider to make it as seamless as possible?
> >>>
> >>> For example, update the executors first and then the schedulers; just
> >>> update the schedulers one at a time, etc.
> >>> Thanks!
> >>>
> >>> Mauricio
> >>>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> --
> >> Jeff Schroeder
> >>
> >> Don't drink and derive, alcohol and analysis don't mix.
> >> http://www.digitalprognosis.com
> >>
> >> --
> >> Zameer Manji
> >>
> >> <http://www.digitalprognosis.com>
>
>

Reply via email to