No one with karma was around to start the meeting official, here are the ad-hoc meeting notes:
Mon Oct 12 18:07:58 2015 jcohen: Hi folks, it seems that no one with karma is around to officially start the meeting, so let’s have an ad-hoc meeting and I’ll manually send out note. Mon Oct 12 18:08:07 2015 wickman: wfm Mon Oct 12 18:08:07 2015 zmanji: let me try to be sure Mon Oct 12 18:08:10 2015 zmanji: ASFBot meeting start Mon Oct 12 18:08:18 2015 zmanji: ASFBot: meeting start Mon Oct 12 18:08:23 2015 jcohen: Let’s start with roll-call, as always, everyone is welcome to participate. Mon Oct 12 18:08:25 2015 wickman: ASFBot: meeting start Mon Oct 12 18:08:35 2015 zmanji: here Mon Oct 12 18:08:36 2015 wickman: ASFBot: j/k lol don't start the meeting Mon Oct 12 18:08:41 2015 wickman: :-( Mon Oct 12 18:08:41 2015 jcohen: here Mon Oct 12 18:08:42 2015 wickman: here Mon Oct 12 18:09:38 2015 jcohen: Looks like a quiet week. Anyone have any topics to discuss? Mon Oct 12 18:10:04 2015 thalin: here Mon Oct 12 18:10:18 2015 wickman: one sec Mon Oct 12 18:10:20 2015 wickman: AURORA-1504 Mon Oct 12 18:10:41 2015 wickman: there was one minor comment on the review about the naming. i called the subcommand 'config read' but stephan erb suggested 'config bind' Mon Oct 12 18:10:44 2015 wickman: i don't care one way or the other Mon Oct 12 18:11:00 2015 wickman: do people feel strongly about what the command should be called? it takes an .aurora or .json file and spits out a fully bound .json version of it Mon Oct 12 18:11:13 2015 wickman: that can be used with other commands that take --read-json Mon Oct 12 18:11:50 2015 jcohen: bind seems ok to me. I don’t feel super strongly. Mon Oct 12 18:12:10 2015 serb: Joined the channel Mon Oct 12 18:12:18 2015 wickman: bind seems reasonable to me as well, since that's basically one of the main things happening. Mon Oct 12 18:13:05 2015 jcohen: sounds good. Anything else on that topic? Mon Oct 12 18:13:27 2015 stephanerb: Joined the channel Mon Oct 12 18:13:50 2015 wickman: just a plug for https://github.com/wickman/sacker which is a package manager thing i built for use with aurora on aws Mon Oct 12 18:14:21 2015 wickman: i've also built a couple aurora extensions (using the client extension feature that's out for review) Mon Oct 12 18:14:33 2015 wickman: one is a binding helper to resolve name -> blob in s3 Mon Oct 12 18:14:45 2015 kts: Joined the channel Mon Oct 12 18:14:46 2015 wickman: and one is a "deploy" subcommand that can be used for staging bound configs in s3 Mon Oct 12 18:15:07 2015 wickman: https://github.com/wickman/sacker/commit/d28da0fed6ada566d11ecae11762ac65432b6dfa Mon Oct 12 18:15:14 2015 wickman: still needs documentation, but i'll be playing around with this for a few more days Mon Oct 12 18:15:22 2015 wickman: might be useful for folks using aurora on aws Mon Oct 12 18:15:36 2015 kts: wickman: awesome, any desire to upstream? Mon Oct 12 18:15:39 2015 jcohen: Sounds exciting, thanks wickman! Mon Oct 12 18:16:18 2015 wickman: the main issue with upstreaming is the potential for dependency creep. sacker depends on boto, but it could depend on zookeeper or * depending on new ledger and store implementations (right now i've only implemented ledgers using dynamo and s3, and an s3 store) Mon Oct 12 18:16:40 2015 wickman: i'd like to just work on the plugin ecosystem in general, and make plugins generally easy to build Mon Oct 12 18:16:51 2015 wickman: and keep the core as light as possible Mon Oct 12 18:18:03 2015 jcohen: Ok, anyone else have a topic? Mon Oct 12 18:19:20 2015 mkhutornenko: Joined the channel Mon Oct 12 18:19:34 2015 jcohen: ok then. Let’s call this meeting concluded. Mon Oct 12 18:19:40 2015 jcohen: Thanks all, I’ll send notes shortly.
