I don't consider it a blocker for 0.16.0, so... if it's ready before I cut
the release, great. If not, we'll get it into 0.17.0?

On Fri, Sep 9, 2016 at 8:45 PM, Zameer Manji <zma...@apache.org> wrote:

> Resending this message so it's not stuck in people's spam.
>
> This issue is serious but can be fixed quickly I think.
>
> On Fri, Sep 9, 2016 at 6:19 PM, Dmitriy Shirchenko <shirc...@uber.com>
> wrote:
>
> > We discovered an issue with webhook today, so we may want to consider not
> > releasing 0.16.0 until we fix this issue next week:
> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AURORA-1769
> >
> > On Tue, Sep 6, 2016 at 1:34 PM Maxim Khutornenko <ma...@apache.org>
> wrote:
> >
> > > I'd give it one more release as it may break any internal consumers of
> > > that data. Same about AURORA-1708.
> > >
> > > As for AURORA-1680, it should be very safe to fix now.
> > >
> > > On Tue, Sep 6, 2016 at 1:18 PM, Zameer Manji <zma...@apache.org>
> wrote:
> > > > Should we fix AURORA-1707 in this release or bump it to the next
> > > release? I
> > > > noticed that it has been unloved for some time.
> > > >
> > > > On Tue, Sep 6, 2016 at 10:54 AM, Zameer Manji <zma...@apache.org>
> > wrote:
> > > >
> > > >> + 1
> > > >>
> > > >> I think we are due for a release so folks can get Mesos 1.0 and GPU
> > > >> support.
> > > >>
> > > >> On Tue, Sep 6, 2016 at 8:36 AM, Joshua Cohen <jco...@apache.org>
> > wrote:
> > > >>
> > > >>> Hi Aurorans,
> > > >>>
> > > >>> I plan to kick off the 0.16.0 release some time later this week.
> > Please
> > > >>> let
> > > >>> me know if there are any outstanding patches you'd like to ship
> > before
> > > >>> this
> > > >>> release.
> > > >>>
> > > >>> Thanks!
> > > >>>
> > > >>> Joshua
> > > >>>
> > > >>
> > > >>
> > >
> >
>

Reply via email to