I don't consider it a blocker for 0.16.0, so... if it's ready before I cut the release, great. If not, we'll get it into 0.17.0?
On Fri, Sep 9, 2016 at 8:45 PM, Zameer Manji <zma...@apache.org> wrote: > Resending this message so it's not stuck in people's spam. > > This issue is serious but can be fixed quickly I think. > > On Fri, Sep 9, 2016 at 6:19 PM, Dmitriy Shirchenko <shirc...@uber.com> > wrote: > > > We discovered an issue with webhook today, so we may want to consider not > > releasing 0.16.0 until we fix this issue next week: > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AURORA-1769 > > > > On Tue, Sep 6, 2016 at 1:34 PM Maxim Khutornenko <ma...@apache.org> > wrote: > > > > > I'd give it one more release as it may break any internal consumers of > > > that data. Same about AURORA-1708. > > > > > > As for AURORA-1680, it should be very safe to fix now. > > > > > > On Tue, Sep 6, 2016 at 1:18 PM, Zameer Manji <zma...@apache.org> > wrote: > > > > Should we fix AURORA-1707 in this release or bump it to the next > > > release? I > > > > noticed that it has been unloved for some time. > > > > > > > > On Tue, Sep 6, 2016 at 10:54 AM, Zameer Manji <zma...@apache.org> > > wrote: > > > > > > > >> + 1 > > > >> > > > >> I think we are due for a release so folks can get Mesos 1.0 and GPU > > > >> support. > > > >> > > > >> On Tue, Sep 6, 2016 at 8:36 AM, Joshua Cohen <jco...@apache.org> > > wrote: > > > >> > > > >>> Hi Aurorans, > > > >>> > > > >>> I plan to kick off the 0.16.0 release some time later this week. > > Please > > > >>> let > > > >>> me know if there are any outstanding patches you'd like to ship > > before > > > >>> this > > > >>> release. > > > >>> > > > >>> Thanks! > > > >>> > > > >>> Joshua > > > >>> > > > >> > > > >> > > > > > >