+1, everything looks good to me!

On Sat, Jul 22, 2017 at 1:36 AM, Erb, Stephan <stephan....@blue-yonder.com>
wrote:

> +1
>
> The verification scripts for all distributions in the test repository have
> passed for me.
>
>
> On 19.07.17, 01:58, "Santhosh Kumar Shanmugham" 
> <sshanmug...@twitter.com.INVALID>
> wrote:
>
>     I missed to update one of the bintray links.
>
>     It should be https://dl.bintray.com/shanmugh/aurora/
>
>     On Tue, Jul 18, 2017 at 3:43 PM, Santhosh Kumar Shanmugham <
>     sshanmug...@twitter.com> wrote:
>
>     > Kicking off the votes.
>     >
>     > +1
>     >
>     > On Tue, Jul 18, 2017 at 3:42 PM, Santhosh Kumar Shanmugham <
>     > sshanmug...@twitter.com> wrote:
>     >
>     >> All,
>     >>
>     >> I propose that we accept the following artifacts as the official
> deb and
>     >> rpm packaging for
>     >> Apache Aurora 0.18.x:
>     >>
>     >> https://dl.bintray.com/sshanmugham/aurora/
>     >>
>     >> The Aurora deb and rpm packaging includes the following:
>     >>
>     >> ---
>     >>
>     >> The branch used to create the packaging is:
>     >> https://git1-us-west.apache.org/repos/asf?p=aurora-packaging
>     >> .git;a=tree;hb=refs/heads/0.18.x
>     >>
>     >> The packages are available at:
>     >> https://dl.bintray.com/shanmugh/aurora/
>     >>
>     >> The GPG keys used to sign the packages are available at:
>     >> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/aurora/KEYS
>     >>
>     >> Please download, verify, and test. Detailed test instructions are
>     >> available here:
>     >> https://git1-us-west.apache.org/repos/asf?p=aurora-packaging
>     >> .git;a=tree;f=test;hb=refs/heads/0.18.x
>     >>
>     >>
>     >> The vote will close on Fri Jul 21 14:30:27 PDT 2017
>     >>
>     >> [ ] +1 Release these as the deb and rpm packages for Apache Aurora
> 0.18.x
>     >> [ ] +0
>     >> [ ] -1 Do not release these artifacts because...
>     >>
>     >> ------------------------------------------------------------
>     >> --------------------
>     >>
>     >> -Santhosh
>     >>
>     >
>     >
>
>
>

Reply via email to