We have two outstanding regressions I'll get to this week, one is minor and
one is relatively serious (no longer showing pending reasons on the task
list). If people are comfortable moving forward without those fixes, then
go for it.

On Tue, Nov 7, 2017 at 9:55 AM, Bill Farner <wfar...@apache.org> wrote:

> David - now that a week has passed, do you see any further reason to wait?
>
> We are still seeing minor cosmetic issues and bug fixes pop up. It would be
> > pretty harmful to have to deal with these for an entire release
>
>
> It's worth stating the obvious - we can cut point releases when necessary
> to address this type of issue.
>
> On Mon, Oct 30, 2017 at 8:41 AM, David McLaughlin <dmclaugh...@apache.org>
> wrote:
>
> > I'd like another week of feedback to incorporate changes of the new UI.
> We
> > are still seeing minor cosmetic issues and bug fixes pop up. It would be
> > pretty harmful to have to deal with these for an entire release.
> >
> > On Mon, Oct 30, 2017 at 8:34 AM, Erb, Stephan <
> stephan....@blue-yonder.com
> > >
> > wrote:
> >
> > > Sounds good to me. Getting the release out quickly will allow us to
> > remove
> > > the old mybatis/h2 code sooner.
> > >
> > > I planned on upgrading to Mesos 1.4. Unfortunately this is currently
> > > blocked by a missing mesos.interface package on PyPI. I send a mail out
> > to
> > > the Mesos Dev list but I am still waiting for a response. So this will
> > have
> > > to wait for 0.20.
> > >
> > > On 29.10.17, 23:15, "Bill Farner" <wfar...@apache.org> wrote:
> > >
> > >     Folks,
> > >
> > >     I propose we cut our 0.19.0 release soon.  We have built up a
> > > respectable
> > >     set of unreleased changes
> > >     <https://github.com/apache/aurora/blob/master/RELEASE-NOTES.md>.
> I
> > am
> > >     happy to perform this release, and should be able to do so as soon
> as
> > > this
> > >     week.
> > >
> > >     Please chime in here if there is any outstanding work that should
> > > block a
> > >     release.
> > >
> > >
> > >     Cheers,
> > >
> > >     Bill
> > >
> > >
> > >
> >
>

Reply via email to